answers.opencv.org/question/757/haartraining-vs-traincascade-object-detection
Preview meta tags from the answers.opencv.org website.
Linked Hostnames
9- 48 links toanswers.opencv.org
- 3 links todocs.opencv.org
- 2 links tocode.opencv.org
- 2 links togithub.com
- 1 link toaskbot.com
- 1 link tocreativecommons.org
- 1 link toforum.opencv.org
- 1 link toopencv.org
General Meta Tags
8- titleHaartraining vs Traincascade : Object Detection - OpenCV Q&A Forum
- descriptionHello! I wanted to do an app that was able, through a picture, to recognize staplers. I've done a quick search and i went with Haartraining. (Not sure if it was the right choice! Comments?) The thing is, i've only trained the classifier with few positive and negative examples (46 and 30) and as far as i understand, it's recommended to have at least a 1000 of each. The quantity it self ain't a problem, but i hear it takes about a day to run haartraining when you have that amount of pictures. Then, i thought: maybe traincascade would be a better choice! Now i'm all confused.. Please, let me hear what YOU THINK :D Thanks in advance.
- Content-Typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=EDGE
- keywords,OpenCV,answers,questions,forum,community
Link Tags
9- alternatehttps://answers.opencv.org/feeds/rss/
- canonicalhttps://answers.opencv.org/question/757/haartraining-vs-traincascade-object-detection/
- shortcut icon/upfiles/icon_opencv.ico
- shortcut icon/m/opencv/media/images/favicon.ico
- stylesheet/m/CACHE/css/b4878527f390.css
Links
60- http://askbot.com
- http://code.opencv.org/projects/opencv/repository/revisions/master/changes/data/vec_files/trainingfaces_24-24.vec;
- http://code.opencv.org/projects/opencv/repository/revisions/master/show/data/lbpcascades
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
- http://docs.opencv.org/doc/user_guide/ug_traincascade.html