arxiv.org/abs/1102.2936

Preview meta tags from the arxiv.org website.

Linked Hostnames

25

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2936

Decoding by Embedding: Correct Decoding Radius and DMT Optimality

The closest vector problem (CVP) and shortest (nonzero) vector problem (SVP) are the core algorithmic problems on Euclidean lattices. They are central to the applications of lattices in many problems of communications and cryptography. Kannan's \emph{embedding technique} is a powerful technique for solving the approximate CVP, yet its remarkable practical performance is not well understood. In this paper, the embedding technique is analyzed from a \emph{bounded distance decoding} (BDD) viewpoint. We present two complementary analyses of the embedding technique: We establish a reduction from BDD to Hermite SVP (via unique SVP), which can be used along with any Hermite SVP solver (including, among others, the Lenstra, Lenstra and Lovász (LLL) algorithm), and show that, in the special case of LLL, it performs at least as well as Babai's nearest plane algorithm (LLL-aided SIC). The former analysis helps to explain the folklore practical observation that unique SVP is easier than standard approximate SVP. It is proven that when the LLL algorithm is employed, the embedding technique can solve the CVP provided that the noise norm is smaller than a decoding radius $λ_1/(2γ)$, where $λ_1$ is the minimum distance of the lattice, and $γ\approx O(2^{n/4})$. This substantially improves the previously best known correct decoding bound $γ\approx {O}(2^{n})$. Focusing on the applications of BDD to decoding of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, we also prove that BDD of the regularized lattice is optimal in terms of the diversity-multiplexing gain tradeoff (DMT), and propose practical variants of embedding decoding which require no knowledge of the minimum distance of the lattice and/or further improve the error performance.



Bing

Decoding by Embedding: Correct Decoding Radius and DMT Optimality

https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2936

The closest vector problem (CVP) and shortest (nonzero) vector problem (SVP) are the core algorithmic problems on Euclidean lattices. They are central to the applications of lattices in many problems of communications and cryptography. Kannan's \emph{embedding technique} is a powerful technique for solving the approximate CVP, yet its remarkable practical performance is not well understood. In this paper, the embedding technique is analyzed from a \emph{bounded distance decoding} (BDD) viewpoint. We present two complementary analyses of the embedding technique: We establish a reduction from BDD to Hermite SVP (via unique SVP), which can be used along with any Hermite SVP solver (including, among others, the Lenstra, Lenstra and Lovász (LLL) algorithm), and show that, in the special case of LLL, it performs at least as well as Babai's nearest plane algorithm (LLL-aided SIC). The former analysis helps to explain the folklore practical observation that unique SVP is easier than standard approximate SVP. It is proven that when the LLL algorithm is employed, the embedding technique can solve the CVP provided that the noise norm is smaller than a decoding radius $λ_1/(2γ)$, where $λ_1$ is the minimum distance of the lattice, and $γ\approx O(2^{n/4})$. This substantially improves the previously best known correct decoding bound $γ\approx {O}(2^{n})$. Focusing on the applications of BDD to decoding of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, we also prove that BDD of the regularized lattice is optimal in terms of the diversity-multiplexing gain tradeoff (DMT), and propose practical variants of embedding decoding which require no knowledge of the minimum distance of the lattice and/or further improve the error performance.



DuckDuckGo

https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2936

Decoding by Embedding: Correct Decoding Radius and DMT Optimality

The closest vector problem (CVP) and shortest (nonzero) vector problem (SVP) are the core algorithmic problems on Euclidean lattices. They are central to the applications of lattices in many problems of communications and cryptography. Kannan's \emph{embedding technique} is a powerful technique for solving the approximate CVP, yet its remarkable practical performance is not well understood. In this paper, the embedding technique is analyzed from a \emph{bounded distance decoding} (BDD) viewpoint. We present two complementary analyses of the embedding technique: We establish a reduction from BDD to Hermite SVP (via unique SVP), which can be used along with any Hermite SVP solver (including, among others, the Lenstra, Lenstra and Lovász (LLL) algorithm), and show that, in the special case of LLL, it performs at least as well as Babai's nearest plane algorithm (LLL-aided SIC). The former analysis helps to explain the folklore practical observation that unique SVP is easier than standard approximate SVP. It is proven that when the LLL algorithm is employed, the embedding technique can solve the CVP provided that the noise norm is smaller than a decoding radius $λ_1/(2γ)$, where $λ_1$ is the minimum distance of the lattice, and $γ\approx O(2^{n/4})$. This substantially improves the previously best known correct decoding bound $γ\approx {O}(2^{n})$. Focusing on the applications of BDD to decoding of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, we also prove that BDD of the regularized lattice is optimal in terms of the diversity-multiplexing gain tradeoff (DMT), and propose practical variants of embedding decoding which require no knowledge of the minimum distance of the lattice and/or further improve the error performance.

  • General Meta Tags

    18
    • title
      [1102.2936] Decoding by Embedding: Correct Decoding Radius and DMT Optimality
    • title
      open search
    • title
      open navigation menu
    • title
      contact arXiv
    • title
      subscribe to arXiv mailings
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    10
    • og:type
      website
    • og:site_name
      arXiv.org
    • og:title
      Decoding by Embedding: Correct Decoding Radius and DMT Optimality
    • og:url
      https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2936v3
    • og:image
      /static/browse/0.3.4/images/arxiv-logo-fb.png
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    6
    • twitter:site
      @arxiv
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:title
      Decoding by Embedding: Correct Decoding Radius and DMT Optimality
    • twitter:description
      The closest vector problem (CVP) and shortest (nonzero) vector problem (SVP) are the core algorithmic problems on Euclidean lattices. They are central to the applications of lattices in many...
    • twitter:image
      https://static.arxiv.org/icons/twitter/arxiv-logo-twitter-square.png
  • Link Tags

    12
    • apple-touch-icon
      /static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      /abs/1102.2936
    • icon
      /static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/favicon-16x16.png
    • manifest
      /static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/site.webmanifest

Links

68