arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556
Preview meta tags from the arxiv.org website.
Linked Hostnames
24- 43 links toarxiv.org
- 13 links toinfo.arxiv.org
- 2 links tosubscribe.sorryapp.com
- 1 link toapi.semanticscholar.org
- 1 link tocore.ac.uk
- 1 link todagshub.com
- 1 link todoi.org
- 1 link togotit.pub
Thumbnail
Search Engine Appearance
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
We investigate the optimal model size and number of tokens for training a transformer language model under a given compute budget. We find that current large language models are significantly undertrained, a consequence of the recent focus on scaling language models whilst keeping the amount of training data constant. By training over 400 language models ranging from 70 million to over 16 billion parameters on 5 to 500 billion tokens, we find that for compute-optimal training, the model size and the number of training tokens should be scaled equally: for every doubling of model size the number of training tokens should also be doubled. We test this hypothesis by training a predicted compute-optimal model, Chinchilla, that uses the same compute budget as Gopher but with 70B parameters and 4$\times$ more more data. Chinchilla uniformly and significantly outperforms Gopher (280B), GPT-3 (175B), Jurassic-1 (178B), and Megatron-Turing NLG (530B) on a large range of downstream evaluation tasks. This also means that Chinchilla uses substantially less compute for fine-tuning and inference, greatly facilitating downstream usage. As a highlight, Chinchilla reaches a state-of-the-art average accuracy of 67.5% on the MMLU benchmark, greater than a 7% improvement over Gopher.
Bing
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
We investigate the optimal model size and number of tokens for training a transformer language model under a given compute budget. We find that current large language models are significantly undertrained, a consequence of the recent focus on scaling language models whilst keeping the amount of training data constant. By training over 400 language models ranging from 70 million to over 16 billion parameters on 5 to 500 billion tokens, we find that for compute-optimal training, the model size and the number of training tokens should be scaled equally: for every doubling of model size the number of training tokens should also be doubled. We test this hypothesis by training a predicted compute-optimal model, Chinchilla, that uses the same compute budget as Gopher but with 70B parameters and 4$\times$ more more data. Chinchilla uniformly and significantly outperforms Gopher (280B), GPT-3 (175B), Jurassic-1 (178B), and Megatron-Turing NLG (530B) on a large range of downstream evaluation tasks. This also means that Chinchilla uses substantially less compute for fine-tuning and inference, greatly facilitating downstream usage. As a highlight, Chinchilla reaches a state-of-the-art average accuracy of 67.5% on the MMLU benchmark, greater than a 7% improvement over Gopher.
DuckDuckGo
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
We investigate the optimal model size and number of tokens for training a transformer language model under a given compute budget. We find that current large language models are significantly undertrained, a consequence of the recent focus on scaling language models whilst keeping the amount of training data constant. By training over 400 language models ranging from 70 million to over 16 billion parameters on 5 to 500 billion tokens, we find that for compute-optimal training, the model size and the number of training tokens should be scaled equally: for every doubling of model size the number of training tokens should also be doubled. We test this hypothesis by training a predicted compute-optimal model, Chinchilla, that uses the same compute budget as Gopher but with 70B parameters and 4$\times$ more more data. Chinchilla uniformly and significantly outperforms Gopher (280B), GPT-3 (175B), Jurassic-1 (178B), and Megatron-Turing NLG (530B) on a large range of downstream evaluation tasks. This also means that Chinchilla uses substantially less compute for fine-tuning and inference, greatly facilitating downstream usage. As a highlight, Chinchilla reaches a state-of-the-art average accuracy of 67.5% on the MMLU benchmark, greater than a 7% improvement over Gopher.
General Meta Tags
36- title[2203.15556] Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
- titleopen search
- titleopen navigation menu
- titlecontact arXiv
- titlesubscribe to arXiv mailings
Open Graph Meta Tags
10- og:typewebsite
- og:site_namearXiv.org
- og:titleTraining Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
- og:urlhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556v1
- og:image/static/browse/0.3.4/images/arxiv-logo-fb.png
Twitter Meta Tags
6- twitter:site@arxiv
- twitter:cardsummary
- twitter:titleTraining Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
- twitter:descriptionWe investigate the optimal model size and number of tokens for training a transformer language model under a given compute budget. We find that current large language models are significantly...
- twitter:imagehttps://static.arxiv.org/icons/twitter/arxiv-logo-twitter-square.png
Link Tags
12- apple-touch-icon/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/apple-touch-icon.png
- canonical/abs/2203.15556
- icon/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/favicon-32x32.png
- icon/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/favicon-16x16.png
- manifest/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/site.webmanifest
Links
79- http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0
- http://gotit.pub/faq
- http://www.bibsonomy.org/BibtexHandler?requTask=upload&url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556&description=Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/arXiv:2203.15556
- https://arxiv.org