astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/61284/why-years-like-1700-1800-and-1900-are-not-leap-years-when-they-should-be

Preview meta tags from the astronomy.stackexchange.com website.

Linked Hostnames

40

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/61284/why-years-like-1700-1800-and-1900-are-not-leap-years-when-they-should-be

Why years like 1700, 1800, and 1900 are not leap years when they should be?

Earth's revolution period around the Sun is 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes which means we need to have at least one leap year every four years. Yet, the Gregorian calendar tries to correct itself by ...



Bing

Why years like 1700, 1800, and 1900 are not leap years when they should be?

https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/61284/why-years-like-1700-1800-and-1900-are-not-leap-years-when-they-should-be

Earth's revolution period around the Sun is 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes which means we need to have at least one leap year every four years. Yet, the Gregorian calendar tries to correct itself by ...



DuckDuckGo

https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/61284/why-years-like-1700-1800-and-1900-are-not-leap-years-when-they-should-be

Why years like 1700, 1800, and 1900 are not leap years when they should be?

Earth's revolution period around the Sun is 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes which means we need to have at least one leap year every four years. Yet, the Gregorian calendar tries to correct itself by ...

  • General Meta Tags

    2
    • title
      sidereal period - Why years like 1700, 1800, and 1900 are not leap years when they should be? - Astronomy Stack Exchange
    • viewport
      width=device-width, height=device-height, initial-scale=1.0, minimum-scale=1.0

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:type
      website
    • og:url
      https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/61284/why-years-like-1700-1800-and-1900-are-not-leap-years-when-they-should-be
    • og:site_name
      Astronomy Stack Exchange
    • og:image
      https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/astronomy/Img/[email protected]?v=46633b7672b0
    • twitter:title
      Why years like 1700, 1800, and 1900 are not leap years when they should be?

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    2
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:domain
      astronomy.stackexchange.com

  • Link Tags

    10
    • alternate
      /feeds/question/61284
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/astronomy/Img/apple-touch-icon.png?v=9bf016175aaa
    • canonical
      https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/61284/why-years-like-1700-1800-and-1900-are-not-leap-years-when-they-should-be
    • image_src
      https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/astronomy/Img/apple-touch-icon.png?v=9bf016175aaa
    • search
      /opensearch.xml

Links

98