
blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability
Preview meta tags from the blog.asymmetric.re website.
Linked Hostnames
15- 10 links toblog.asymmetric.re
- 6 links towww.asymmetric.re
- 4 links togithub.com
- 1 link toasymmetric.re
- 1 link tobrightthemes.com
- 1 link toclientdiversity.org
- 1 link toen.wikipedia.org
- 1 link toethereum.org
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
https://blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability
Ghost in the Block: Ethereum Consensus Vulnerability
In this blog post, we will show how a small difference in SSZ deserialization between the Prysm and Lighthouse clients could have allowed an attacker to severely degrade Ethereum consensus.
Bing
Ghost in the Block: Ethereum Consensus Vulnerability
https://blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability
In this blog post, we will show how a small difference in SSZ deserialization between the Prysm and Lighthouse clients could have allowed an attacker to severely degrade Ethereum consensus.
DuckDuckGo

Ghost in the Block: Ethereum Consensus Vulnerability
In this blog post, we will show how a small difference in SSZ deserialization between the Prysm and Lighthouse clients could have allowed an attacker to severely degrade Ethereum consensus.
General Meta Tags
12- titleGhost in the Block: Ethereum Consensus Vulnerability
- charsetutf-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- HandheldFriendlyTrue
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
Open Graph Meta Tags
8- og:site_nameAsymmetric Research
- og:typearticle
- og:titleGhost in the Block: Ethereum Consensus Vulnerability
- og:descriptionIn this blog post, we will show how a small difference in SSZ deserialization between the Prysm and Lighthouse clients could have allowed an attacker to severely degrade Ethereum consensus.
- og:urlhttps://blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability/
Twitter Meta Tags
10- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:titleGhost in the Block: Ethereum Consensus Vulnerability
- twitter:descriptionIn this blog post, we will show how a small difference in SSZ deserialization between the Prysm and Lighthouse clients could have allowed an attacker to severely degrade Ethereum consensus.
- twitter:urlhttps://blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability/
- twitter:imagehttps://blog.asymmetric.re/content/images/size/w1200/2024/10/ghost.png
Link Tags
13- alternatehttps://blog.asymmetric.re/rss/
- canonicalhttps://blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability/
- iconhttps://blog.asymmetric.re/content/images/size/w256h256/format/jpeg/2025/05/XDUeLrd4_400x400--1-.jpg
- preconnecthttps://fonts.googleapis.com
- preconnecthttps://fonts.gstatic.com
Emails
1- ?subject=Ghost%20in%20the%20Block%3A%20Ethereum%20Consensus%20Vulnerability&body=https://blog.asymmetric.re/ghost-in-the-block-ethereum-consensus-vulnerability/ Ghost%20in%20the%20Block%3A%20Ethereum%20Consensus%20Vulnerability
Links
32- https://asymmetric.re
- https://blog.asymmetric.re
- https://blog.asymmetric.re/author/anthony
- https://blog.asymmetric.re/author/giuseppe
- https://blog.asymmetric.re/author/maxwell