
blog.chewxy.com/2017/01/04/what-to-test
Preview meta tags from the blog.chewxy.com website.
Linked Hostnames
8- 6 links toblog.chewxy.com
- 3 links togithub.com
- 1 link todeanattali.com
- 1 link todisqus.com
- 1 link togephi.org
- 1 link togodoc.org
- 1 link togohugo.io
- 1 link totwitter.com
Search Engine Appearance
What To Test
You’re in a rush. Your product demo was due three months ago. And you still don’t have good unit tests. What do you do? You prioritize. You wrote a very complex piece of machinery with a lot of moving parts. You sorta know how they all fit together in your mind but there isn’t any good know if the program you wrote actually works the way you want it. The solution: unit testing. But how to test and where to start? What do you do? You prioritize. This post is about how I prioritize what to test. I know how I write my programs, and I write them in a particular way. Feel free to adapt the following to your own process. Since my program is made mostly of functions, I prioritize my tests by analyzing the function calls of the package/program. Some functions are called many times by different callers, some functions are top functions which calls other functions and outside of the package the top functions are never called. This forms a hierarchy of sorts - some calls are simply more important than others. Since I write mostly in Go nowadays, I’ll use Go as an example. The Go toolchain actually provide us with a lot of useful tools to analyze and prioritize tasks. The most important tool is the callgraph program. This is the invocation of the spell: callgraph -algo=static -format=graphviz $(go list -tags=release -f '{{.GoFiles}}' | sed -ne 's/\[//p' | sed -ne 's/\]//p') | grep -P '\-\> "(PACKAGENAME|\(\*?PACKAGENAME\.)' | uniq > callgraph.dot
Bing
What To Test
You’re in a rush. Your product demo was due three months ago. And you still don’t have good unit tests. What do you do? You prioritize. You wrote a very complex piece of machinery with a lot of moving parts. You sorta know how they all fit together in your mind but there isn’t any good know if the program you wrote actually works the way you want it. The solution: unit testing. But how to test and where to start? What do you do? You prioritize. This post is about how I prioritize what to test. I know how I write my programs, and I write them in a particular way. Feel free to adapt the following to your own process. Since my program is made mostly of functions, I prioritize my tests by analyzing the function calls of the package/program. Some functions are called many times by different callers, some functions are top functions which calls other functions and outside of the package the top functions are never called. This forms a hierarchy of sorts - some calls are simply more important than others. Since I write mostly in Go nowadays, I’ll use Go as an example. The Go toolchain actually provide us with a lot of useful tools to analyze and prioritize tasks. The most important tool is the callgraph program. This is the invocation of the spell: callgraph -algo=static -format=graphviz $(go list -tags=release -f '{{.GoFiles}}' | sed -ne 's/\[//p' | sed -ne 's/\]//p') | grep -P '\-\> "(PACKAGENAME|\(\*?PACKAGENAME\.)' | uniq > callgraph.dot
DuckDuckGo
What To Test
You’re in a rush. Your product demo was due three months ago. And you still don’t have good unit tests. What do you do? You prioritize. You wrote a very complex piece of machinery with a lot of moving parts. You sorta know how they all fit together in your mind but there isn’t any good know if the program you wrote actually works the way you want it. The solution: unit testing. But how to test and where to start? What do you do? You prioritize. This post is about how I prioritize what to test. I know how I write my programs, and I write them in a particular way. Feel free to adapt the following to your own process. Since my program is made mostly of functions, I prioritize my tests by analyzing the function calls of the package/program. Some functions are called many times by different callers, some functions are top functions which calls other functions and outside of the package the top functions are never called. This forms a hierarchy of sorts - some calls are simply more important than others. Since I write mostly in Go nowadays, I’ll use Go as an example. The Go toolchain actually provide us with a lot of useful tools to analyze and prioritize tasks. The most important tool is the callgraph program. This is the invocation of the spell: callgraph -algo=static -format=graphviz $(go list -tags=release -f '{{.GoFiles}}' | sed -ne 's/\[//p' | sed -ne 's/\]//p') | grep -P '\-\> "(PACKAGENAME|\(\*?PACKAGENAME\.)' | uniq > callgraph.dot
General Meta Tags
7- titleWhat To Test - Bigger on the Inside
- charsetutf-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0
- descriptionYou’re in a rush. Your product demo was due three months ago. And you still don’t have good unit tests. What do you do? You prioritize. You wrote a very complex piece of machinery with a lot of moving parts. You sorta know how they all fit together in your mind but there isn’t any good know if the program you wrote actually works the way you want it. The solution: unit testing. But how to test and where to start? What do you do? You prioritize. This post is about how I prioritize what to test. I know how I write my programs, and I write them in a particular way. Feel free to adapt the following to your own process. Since my program is made mostly of functions, I prioritize my tests by analyzing the function calls of the package/program. Some functions are called many times by different callers, some functions are top functions which calls other functions and outside of the package the top functions are never called. This forms a hierarchy of sorts - some calls are simply more important than others. Since I write mostly in Go nowadays, I’ll use Go as an example. The Go toolchain actually provide us with a lot of useful tools to analyze and prioritize tasks. The most important tool is the callgraph program. This is the invocation of the spell: callgraph -algo=static -format=graphviz $(go list -tags=release -f '{{.GoFiles}}' | sed -ne 's/\[//p' | sed -ne 's/\]//p') | grep -P '\-\> "(PACKAGENAME|\(\*?PACKAGENAME\.)' | uniq > callgraph.dot
Open Graph Meta Tags
5- og:titleWhat To Test
- og:descriptionYou’re in a rush. Your product demo was due three months ago. And you still don’t have good unit tests. What do you do? You prioritize. You wrote a very complex piece of machinery with a lot of moving parts. You sorta know how they all fit together in your mind but there isn’t any good know if the program you wrote actually works the way you want it. The solution: unit testing. But how to test and where to start? What do you do? You prioritize. This post is about how I prioritize what to test. I know how I write my programs, and I write them in a particular way. Feel free to adapt the following to your own process. Since my program is made mostly of functions, I prioritize my tests by analyzing the function calls of the package/program. Some functions are called many times by different callers, some functions are top functions which calls other functions and outside of the package the top functions are never called. This forms a hierarchy of sorts - some calls are simply more important than others. Since I write mostly in Go nowadays, I’ll use Go as an example. The Go toolchain actually provide us with a lot of useful tools to analyze and prioritize tasks. The most important tool is the callgraph program. This is the invocation of the spell: callgraph -algo=static -format=graphviz $(go list -tags=release -f '{{.GoFiles}}' | sed -ne 's/\[//p' | sed -ne 's/\]//p') | grep -P '\-\> "(PACKAGENAME|\(\*?PACKAGENAME\.)' | uniq > callgraph.dot
- og:urlhttps://blog.chewxy.com/2017/01/04/what-to-test/
- og:typewebsite
- og:site_nameBigger on the Inside
Twitter Meta Tags
5- twitter:titleWhat To Test
- twitter:descriptionYou’re in a rush. Your product demo was due three months ago. And you still don’t have good unit tests. What do you do? You prioritize. You wrote a very complex piece of machinery with a …
- twitter:cardsummary
- twitter:site@chewxy
- twitter:creator@chewxy
Link Tags
13- alternatehttps://blog.chewxy.com/index.xml
- stylesheethttps://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/KaTeX/0.10.0/katex.min.css
- stylesheethttps://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.5.0/css/all.css
- stylesheethttps://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css
- stylesheethttps://blog.chewxy.com/css/main.css
Links
15- https://blog.chewxy.com
- https://blog.chewxy.com/2016/12/06/a-direct-way-of-understanding-backpropagation-and-gradient-descent
- https://blog.chewxy.com/2017/03/23/new-blog
- https://blog.chewxy.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62010a07151a1b22050f030b0e4c010d0f
- https://blog.chewxy.com/page