
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6815
Preview meta tags from the datatracker.ietf.org website.
Linked Hostnames
7- 25 links todatatracker.ietf.org
- 5 links towww.rfc-editor.org
- 1 link togithub.com
- 1 link tohome.comcast.net
- 1 link tomailarchive.ietf.org
- 1 link totrustee.ietf.org
- 1 link towww.sobco.com
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6815
RFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, )
Bing
RFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6815
Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, )
DuckDuckGo

RFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, )
General Meta Tags
12- titleRFC 6815 - Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
- charsetutf-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
- descriptionApplicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, )
Open Graph Meta Tags
10- og:titleRFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
- og:urlhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6815
- og:site_nameIETF Datatracker
- og:descriptionThe Benchmarking Methodology Working Group (BMWG) has been developing key performance metrics and laboratory test methods since 1990, and continues this work at present. The methods described in RFC 2544 are intended to generate traffic that overloads network device resources in order to assess their capacity. Overload of shared resources would likely be harmful to user traffic performance on a production network, and there are further negative consequences identified with production application of the methods. This memo clarifies the scope of RFC 2544 and other IETF BMWG benchmarking work for isolated test environments only, and it encourages new standards activity for measurement methods applicable outside that scope. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
- og:typearticle
Twitter Meta Tags
1- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
Link Tags
12- alternate/feed/document-changes/rfc6815/
- apple-touch-iconhttps://static.ietf.org/dt/12.47.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-180.png
- canonicalhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6815
- iconhttps://static.ietf.org/dt/12.47.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-32.png
- iconhttps://static.ietf.org/dt/12.47.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-16.png
Emails
5- sob%40sobco.com
- kdubray%40ironbridgenetworks.com
- mcquaid%40wg.com
- acmorton%40att.com
- [email protected]?subject=rfc6815
Links
35- http://home.comcast.net/~acmacm
- http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info
- http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6815
- http://www.sobco.com
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-2544-as/08