
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6815
Preview meta tags from the datatracker.ietf.org website.
Linked Hostnames
10- 74 links todatatracker.ietf.org
- 6 links towww.ietf.org
- 4 links towww.rfc-editor.org
- 2 links togithub.com
- 2 links tomailarchive.ietf.org
- 1 link tostatus.ietf.org
- 1 link totrustee.ietf.org
- 1 link towww.iab.org
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6815
RFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, November 2012)
Bing
RFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6815
Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, November 2012)
DuckDuckGo

RFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful (RFC 6815, November 2012)
General Meta Tags
12- titleRFC 6815 - Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
- charsetutf-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
- article:sectionIETF - Internet Engineering Task Force
Open Graph Meta Tags
10- og:titleRFC 6815: Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
- og:urlhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6815/
- og:site_nameIETF Datatracker
- og:descriptionThe Benchmarking Methodology Working Group (BMWG) has been developing key performance metrics and laboratory test methods since 1990, and continues this work at present. The methods described in RFC 2544 are intended to generate traffic that overloads network device resources in order to assess their capacity. Overload of shared resources would likely be harmful to user traffic performance on a production network, and there are further negative consequences identified with production application of the methods. This memo clarifies the scope of RFC 2544 and other IETF BMWG benchmarking work for isolated test environments only, and it encourages new standards activity for measurement methods applicable outside that scope. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
- og:typearticle
Twitter Meta Tags
1- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
Link Tags
13- alternate/feed/document-changes/rfc6815/
- apple-touch-iconhttps://static.ietf.org/dt/12.45.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-180.png
- canonicalhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6815/
- iconhttps://static.ietf.org/dt/12.45.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-32.png
- iconhttps://static.ietf.org/dt/12.45.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-16.png
Emails
8- sob%40sobco.com
- kdubray%40ironbridgenetworks.com
- mcquaid%40wg.com
- acmorton%40att.com
- rbonica%40juniper.net
Links
93- https://datatracker.ietf.org
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/create
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/login/?next=/doc/rfc6815
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/reset
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/settings