datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8126

Preview meta tags from the datatracker.ietf.org website.

Linked Hostnames

10

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8126

RFC 8126: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs

Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (RFC 8126, June 2017)



Bing

RFC 8126: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8126

Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (RFC 8126, June 2017)



DuckDuckGo

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8126

RFC 8126: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs

Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (RFC 8126, June 2017)

  • General Meta Tags

    11
    • title
      RFC 8126 - Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
    • charset
      utf-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
    • article:section
      IETF - Internet Engineering Task Force
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    10
    • og:title
      RFC 8126: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
    • og:url
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8126/
    • og:site_name
      IETF Datatracker
    • og:description
      Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use constants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in these fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their allocations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance describing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as when and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Considerations is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of a registry. This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 5226.
    • og:type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
  • Link Tags

    13
    • alternate
      /feed/document-changes/rfc8126/
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://static.ietf.org/dt/12.43.1/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-180.png
    • canonical
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8126/
    • icon
      https://static.ietf.org/dt/12.43.1/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-32.png
    • icon
      https://static.ietf.org/dt/12.43.1/ietf/images/ietf-logo-nor-16.png

Emails

6
  • mcotton%40amsl.com
  • barryleiba%40gmail.com
  • narten%40cs.duke.edu
  • terry.manderson%40icann.org
  • [email protected]?subject=Mail%20regarding%20rfc8126

Links

92