discourse.ros.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512/5

Preview meta tags from the discourse.ros.org website.

Linked Hostnames

10

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://discourse.ros.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512/5

Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea

Documentation Why don’t we adopt the usage of Nextra or Docusaurus and remodel the ROS wiki as it is considerably harder for any beginner to setup ROS? I can volunteer for this as well if needed.



Bing

Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea

https://discourse.ros.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512/5

Documentation Why don’t we adopt the usage of Nextra or Docusaurus and remodel the ROS wiki as it is considerably harder for any beginner to setup ROS? I can volunteer for this as well if needed.



DuckDuckGo

https://discourse.ros.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512/5

Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea

Documentation Why don’t we adopt the usage of Nextra or Docusaurus and remodel the ROS wiki as it is considerably harder for any beginner to setup ROS? I can volunteer for this as well if needed.

  • General Meta Tags

    10
    • title
      Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea - #5 by clalancette - ROS General - Open Robotics Discourse
    • charset
      utf-8
    • description
      Documentation Why don’t we adopt the usage of Nextra or Docusaurus and remodel the ROS wiki as it is considerably harder for any beginner to setup ROS? I can volunteer for this as well if needed.
    • generator
      Discourse 3.5.0.beta9-dev - https://github.com/discourse/discourse version 63328ede0859c0bbe35b7492b630c27201b59711
    • theme-color
      #fff

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    11
    • og:site_name
      Open Robotics Discourse
    • og:type
      website
    • og:image
      https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/ros/original/3X/c/7/c71236cce31c28484615e307a137008a40ca9b22.svg
    • og:url
      https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512/5
    • og:title
      Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    4
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:url
      https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512/5
    • twitter:title
      Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea
    • twitter:description
      Given that ROS 1 is only supported for the next 1.5 years, I don’t think we should spend significant time on restructuring the documentation. For ROS 2, the Sphinx output already looks extremely similar to Nextra or Docusaurus, so I don’t see a very compelling reason to change tools there. Of course updates to the contents are very welcome.

  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    20
    • position
      1
    • position
      2
    • headline
      Why don't we use Docusaurus / Nextra ? A propsective idea
    • datePublished
      2024-01-08T00:41:33Z
    • articleSection
      ROS General

  • Link Tags

    35
    • alternate nofollow
      https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/ros/optimized/2X/2/2c5448382ee325e1551da13f3967778fac48255e_2_180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/why-dont-we-use-docusaurus-nextra-a-propsective-idea/35512
    • icon
      https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/uploads/ros/optimized/2X/3/3d0b4614bf91d286c8a2be67ab55dc299eff4c45_2_32x32.png
    • url
      https://discourse.openrobotics.org/u/AbhijithGanesh

Links

26