doi.org/10.1007/BF02187740

Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

22

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187740

Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II - Discrete & Computational Geometry

We use random sampling for several new geometric algorithms. The algorithms are “Las Vegas,” and their expected bounds are with respect to the



Bing

Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II - Discrete & Computational Geometry

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187740

We use random sampling for several new geometric algorithms. The algorithms are “Las Vegas,” and their expected bounds are with respect to the



DuckDuckGo

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187740

Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II - Discrete & Computational Geometry

We use random sampling for several new geometric algorithms. The algorithms are “Las Vegas,” and their expected bounds are with respect to the

  • General Meta Tags

    110
    • title
      Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II | Discrete & Computational Geometry
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • applicable-device
      pc,mobile
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:url
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02187740
    • og:type
      article
    • og:site_name
      SpringerLink
    • og:title
      Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II - Discrete & Computational Geometry
    • og:description
      We use random sampling for several new geometric algorithms. The algorithms are “Las Vegas,” and their expected bounds are with respect to the random behavior of the algorithms. These algorithms follow from new general results giving sharp bounds for the use of random subsets in geometric algorithms. These bounds show that random subsets can be used optimally for divide-and-conquer, and also give bounds for a simple, general technique for building geometric structures incrementally. One new algorithm reports all the intersecting pairs of a set of line segments in the plane, and requiresO(A+n logn) expected time, whereA is the number of intersecting pairs reported. The algorithm requiresO(n) space in the worst case. Another algorithm computes the convex hull ofn points inE d inO(n logn) expected time ford=3, andO(n [d/2]) expected time ford>3. The algorithm also gives fast expected times for random input points. Another algorithm computes the diameter of a set ofn points inE 3 inO(n logn) expected time, and on the way computes the intersection ofn unit balls inE 3. We show thatO(n logA) expected time suffices to compute the convex hull ofn points inE 3, whereA is the number of input points on the surface of the hull. Algorithms for halfspace range reporting are also given. In addition, we give asymptotically tight bounds for (≤k)-sets, which are certain halfspace partitions of point sets, and give a simple proof of Lee's bounds for high-order Voronoi diagrams.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    6
    • twitter:site
      @SpringerLink
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:image:alt
      Content cover image
    • twitter:title
      Applications of random sampling in computational geometry, II
    • twitter:description
      Discrete & Computational Geometry - We use random sampling for several new geometric algorithms. The algorithms are “Las Vegas,” and their expected bounds are with respect to the...
  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    3
    • position
      1
    • position
      2
    • position
      3
  • Link Tags

    9
    • apple-touch-icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/apple-touch-icon-6ef0829b9c.png
    • canonical
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02187740
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/android-chrome-192x192.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-16x16.png

Links

133