doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0748-8

Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

20

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0748-8

Quantitative GSI Determination of Singapore’s Sedimentary Rock Mass by Applying Four Different Approaches - Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

In this paper, the quantitative Geological Strength Index (GSI) for Singapore’s sedimentary rock mass is determined by applying four different approa



Bing

Quantitative GSI Determination of Singapore’s Sedimentary Rock Mass by Applying Four Different Approaches - Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0748-8

In this paper, the quantitative Geological Strength Index (GSI) for Singapore’s sedimentary rock mass is determined by applying four different approa



DuckDuckGo

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0748-8

Quantitative GSI Determination of Singapore’s Sedimentary Rock Mass by Applying Four Different Approaches - Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

In this paper, the quantitative Geological Strength Index (GSI) for Singapore’s sedimentary rock mass is determined by applying four different approa

  • General Meta Tags

    88
    • title
      Quantitative GSI Determination of Singapore’s Sedimentary Rock Mass by Applying Four Different Approaches | Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • applicable-device
      pc,mobile
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:url
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10706-018-0748-8
    • og:type
      article
    • og:site_name
      SpringerLink
    • og:title
      Quantitative GSI Determination of Singapore’s Sedimentary Rock Mass by Applying Four Different Approaches - Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
    • og:description
      In this paper, the quantitative Geological Strength Index (GSI) for Singapore’s sedimentary rock mass is determined by applying four different approaches proposed by Hoek et al. (Quantification of the geological strength index chart, 2013), Cai et al. (Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(1):3–49, 2004), Sonmez and Ulusay (Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:743–760, 1999) and Russo (Improving the reliability of GSI estimation: the integrated GSI-RMi system, 2009) respectively. The relevant rock mass properties, including blockiness and discontinuities surface conditions, of 420 excavated rock faces in a Singapore’s underground excavation project are assessed for such determination. The results obtained by these different approaches are observed falling approximately in the same range between 45 and 55. Moreover, those quantitative GSI results are in good correlation with qualitative GSI which were assessed on excavated rock faces using Hoek et al. (Support of underground excavations in hard rock, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1995) approach. This study demonstrates that the four different approaches perform well by giving similar range of results, although different input parameters are applied in the calculation. A new GSI relationship between joint condition factor Bieniawski (Engineering rock mass classification, Wiley, New York, 1989) and RQD (rock quality designation) is also proposed to better match the qualitative GSI values.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    6
    • twitter:site
      @SpringerLink
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:image:alt
      Content cover image
    • twitter:title
      Quantitative GSI Determination of Singapore’s Sedimentary Rock Mass by Applying Four Different Approaches
    • twitter:description
      Geotechnical and Geological Engineering - In this paper, the quantitative Geological Strength Index (GSI) for Singapore’s sedimentary rock mass is determined by applying four different...
  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    3
    • position
      1
    • position
      2
    • position
      3
  • Link Tags

    9
    • apple-touch-icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/apple-touch-icon-6ef0829b9c.png
    • canonical
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10706-018-0748-8
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/android-chrome-192x192.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-16x16.png

Emails

1

Links

86