doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026573

Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

17

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026573

What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals

Objective Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is under-researched and the aim was to determine the top 10 research priorities for this disease. Design A modified nominal group technique was used to engage participants who had experience of IIH. Setting This James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership was commissioned by IIH UK, a charity. Participants People with IIH, carers, family and friends, and healthcare professionals participated in two rounds of surveys to identify unique research questions unanswered by current evidence. The most popular 26 uncertainties were presented to stakeholders who then agreed the top 10 topics. Results The top 10 research priorities for IIH included aetiology of IIH, the pathological mechanisms of headache in IIH, new treatments in IIH, the difference between acute and gradual visual loss, the best ways to monitor visual function, biomarkers of the disease, hormonal causes of IIH, drug therapies for the treatment of headache, weight loss and its role in IIH and finally, the best intervention to treat IIH and when should surgery be performed. Conclusions This priority setting encouraged people with direct experience of IIH to collectively identify critical gaps in the existing evidence. The overarching research aspiration was to understand the aetiology and management of IIH.



Bing

What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026573

Objective Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is under-researched and the aim was to determine the top 10 research priorities for this disease. Design A modified nominal group technique was used to engage participants who had experience of IIH. Setting This James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership was commissioned by IIH UK, a charity. Participants People with IIH, carers, family and friends, and healthcare professionals participated in two rounds of surveys to identify unique research questions unanswered by current evidence. The most popular 26 uncertainties were presented to stakeholders who then agreed the top 10 topics. Results The top 10 research priorities for IIH included aetiology of IIH, the pathological mechanisms of headache in IIH, new treatments in IIH, the difference between acute and gradual visual loss, the best ways to monitor visual function, biomarkers of the disease, hormonal causes of IIH, drug therapies for the treatment of headache, weight loss and its role in IIH and finally, the best intervention to treat IIH and when should surgery be performed. Conclusions This priority setting encouraged people with direct experience of IIH to collectively identify critical gaps in the existing evidence. The overarching research aspiration was to understand the aetiology and management of IIH.



DuckDuckGo

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026573

What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals

Objective Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is under-researched and the aim was to determine the top 10 research priorities for this disease. Design A modified nominal group technique was used to engage participants who had experience of IIH. Setting This James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership was commissioned by IIH UK, a charity. Participants People with IIH, carers, family and friends, and healthcare professionals participated in two rounds of surveys to identify unique research questions unanswered by current evidence. The most popular 26 uncertainties were presented to stakeholders who then agreed the top 10 topics. Results The top 10 research priorities for IIH included aetiology of IIH, the pathological mechanisms of headache in IIH, new treatments in IIH, the difference between acute and gradual visual loss, the best ways to monitor visual function, biomarkers of the disease, hormonal causes of IIH, drug therapies for the treatment of headache, weight loss and its role in IIH and finally, the best intervention to treat IIH and when should surgery be performed. Conclusions This priority setting encouraged people with direct experience of IIH to collectively identify critical gaps in the existing evidence. The overarching research aspiration was to understand the aetiology and management of IIH.

  • General Meta Tags

    89
    • title
      What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals | BMJ Open
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
    • citation_funding_source
      citation_funder=Medical Research Council;citation_funder_id=http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265;
    • citation_funding_source
      citation_funder=National Institute for Health Research;citation_funder_id=http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272;
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og-title
      What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals
    • og-url
      https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e026573
    • og-site-name
      BMJ Open
    • og-description
      Objective Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is under-researched and the aim was to determine the top 10 research priorities for this disease. Design A modified nominal group technique was used to engage participants who had experience of IIH. Setting This James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership was commissioned by IIH UK, a charity. Participants People with IIH, carers, family and friends, and healthcare professionals participated in two rounds of surveys to identify unique research questions unanswered by current evidence. The most popular 26 uncertainties were presented to stakeholders who then agreed the top 10 topics. Results The top 10 research priorities for IIH included aetiology of IIH, the pathological mechanisms of headache in IIH, new treatments in IIH, the difference between acute and gradual visual loss, the best ways to monitor visual function, biomarkers of the disease, hormonal causes of IIH, drug therapies for the treatment of headache, weight loss and its role in IIH and finally, the best intervention to treat IIH and when should surgery be performed. Conclusions This priority setting encouraged people with direct experience of IIH to collectively identify critical gaps in the existing evidence. The overarching research aspiration was to understand the aetiology and management of IIH.
    • og-type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    4
    • twitter:title
      What are the research priorities for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A priority setting partnership between patients and healthcare professionals
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:image
      https://bmjopen.bmj.com/pages/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/07/bmjopen-default-cover.png
    • twitter:description
      Objective Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is under-researched and the aim was to determine the top 10 research priorities for this disease. Design A modified nominal group technique was used to engage participants who had experience of IIH. Setting This James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership was commissioned by IIH UK, a charity. Participants People with IIH, carers, family and friends, and healthcare professionals participated in two rounds of surveys to identify unique research questions unanswered by current evidence. The most popular 26 uncertainties were presented to stakeholders who then agreed the top 10 topics. Results The top 10 research priorities for IIH included aetiology of IIH, the pathological mechanisms of headache in IIH, new treatments in IIH, the difference between acute and gradual visual loss, the best ways to monitor visual function, biomarkers of the disease, hormonal causes of IIH, drug therapies for the treatment of headache, weight loss and its role in IIH and finally, the best intervention to treat IIH and when should surgery be performed. Conclusions This priority setting encouraged people with direct experience of IIH to collectively identify critical gaps in the existing evidence. The overarching research aspiration was to understand the aetiology and management of IIH.
  • Link Tags

    8
    • alternate
      /content/9/3/e026573.draft-revisions.pdf
    • alternate
      /content/9/3/e026573.full.pdf
    • alternate
      /content/9/3/e026573.full.txt
    • alternate
      /content/9/3/e026573.ppt
    • alternate
      /content/9/3/e026573.download.xml

Links

118