doi.org/10.46298/compositionality-6-3
Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.
Linked Hostnames
12- 26 links todoi.org
- 4 links towww.episciences.org
- 2 links toror.org
- 1 link toarxiv.org
- 1 link tocompositionality.episciences.org
- 1 link tocreativecommons.org
- 1 link todoc.episciences.org
- 1 link tofacebook.com
Thumbnail
Search Engine Appearance
A Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond
Turing machines and spin models share a notion of universality according to which some simulate all others. Is there a theory of universality that captures this notion? We set up a categorical framework for universality which includes as instances universal Turing machines, universal spin models, NP completeness, top of a preorder, denseness of a subset, and more. By identifying necessary conditions for universality, we show that universal spin models cannot be finite. We also characterize when universality can be distinguished from a trivial one and use it to show that universal Turing machines are non-trivial in this sense. Our framework allows not only to compare universalities within each instance, but also instances themselves. We leverage a Fixed Point Theorem inspired by a result of Lawvere to establish that universality and negation give rise to unreachability (such as uncomputability). As such, this work sets the basis for a unified approach to universality and invites the study of further examples within the framework.
Bing
A Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond
Turing machines and spin models share a notion of universality according to which some simulate all others. Is there a theory of universality that captures this notion? We set up a categorical framework for universality which includes as instances universal Turing machines, universal spin models, NP completeness, top of a preorder, denseness of a subset, and more. By identifying necessary conditions for universality, we show that universal spin models cannot be finite. We also characterize when universality can be distinguished from a trivial one and use it to show that universal Turing machines are non-trivial in this sense. Our framework allows not only to compare universalities within each instance, but also instances themselves. We leverage a Fixed Point Theorem inspired by a result of Lawvere to establish that universality and negation give rise to unreachability (such as uncomputability). As such, this work sets the basis for a unified approach to universality and invites the study of further examples within the framework.
DuckDuckGo
A Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond
Turing machines and spin models share a notion of universality according to which some simulate all others. Is there a theory of universality that captures this notion? We set up a categorical framework for universality which includes as instances universal Turing machines, universal spin models, NP completeness, top of a preorder, denseness of a subset, and more. By identifying necessary conditions for universality, we show that universal spin models cannot be finite. We also characterize when universality can be distinguished from a trivial one and use it to show that universal Turing machines are non-trivial in this sense. Our framework allows not only to compare universalities within each instance, but also instances themselves. We leverage a Fixed Point Theorem inspired by a result of Lawvere to establish that universality and negation give rise to unreachability (such as uncomputability). As such, this work sets the basis for a unified approach to universality and invites the study of further examples within the framework.
General Meta Tags
53- title#14134 - A Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
- Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
- citation_journal_titleCompositionality
- citation_authorTomáš Gonda
Open Graph Meta Tags
16- og:titleA Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond
- og:typearticle
- og:article:published_time2024-08-29 15:48:44
- og:article:modified_time2024-09-04 16:05:51
- og:article:authorTomáš Gonda
Twitter Meta Tags
6- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:site@episciences
- twitter:titleA Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond
- twitter:descriptionTuring machines and spin models share a notion of universality according to which some simulate all others. Is there a theory of universality that captures this notion? We set up a categorical framework for universality which includes as instances universal Turing machines, universal spin models, NP completeness, top of a preorder, denseness of a subset, and more. By identifying necessary conditions for universality, we show that universal spin models cannot be finite. We also characterize when universality can be distinguished from a trivial one and use it to show that universal Turing machines are non-trivial in this sense. Our framework allows not only to compare universalities within each instance, but also instances themselves. We leverage a Fixed Point Theorem inspired by a result of Lawvere to establish that universality and negation give rise to unreachability (such as uncomputability). As such, this work sets the basis for a unified approach to universality and invites the study of further examples within the framework.
- twitter:imagehttps://compositionality.episciences.org/img/episciences_logo_1081x1081.jpg
Link Tags
17- apple-touch-icon/apple-touch-icon.png?v=20211124
- dns-prefetchhttps://cdnjs.cloudflare.com
- dns-prefetchhttps://cas.ccsd.cnrs.fr
- http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#inboxhttps://inbox.episciences.org/
- icon/favicon-32x32.png?v=20211124
Emails
1- ?subject=A Framework for Universality in Physics, Computer Science, and Beyond&body=https://doi.org/10.46298/compositionality-6-3
Links
41- https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06851v3
- https://compositionality.episciences.org/rss/papers
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
- https://doc.episciences.org
- https://doi.org