doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-757

Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

17

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-757

Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli

Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.



Bing

Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-757

Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.



DuckDuckGo

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-757

Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli

Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.

  • General Meta Tags

    142
    • title
      ACP - Peer review - Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • charset
      utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
    • theme-color
      #000000
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    4
    • og:image
      https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4523/2022/acp-22-4523-2022-avatar-web.png
    • og:title
      Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
    • og:description
      Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
    • og:url
      https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4523/2022/
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    3
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:title
      Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
    • twitter:description
      Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
  • Link Tags

    39
    • apple-touch-icon-precomposed
      https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_180x180_.png
    • apple-touch-icon-precomposed
      https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_120x120_.png
    • apple-touch-icon-precomposed
      https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_152x152_.png
    • apple-touch-icon-precomposed
      https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_76x76_.png
    • apple-touch-icon-precomposed
      https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_57x57_.ico

Emails

1

Links

112