
doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-757
Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.
Linked Hostnames
17- 54 links towww.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net
- 31 links toacp.copernicus.org
- 12 links toorcid.org
- 2 links toeditor.copernicus.org
- 1 link tocreativecommons.org
- 1 link toegu-letters.net
- 1 link toegusphere.net
- 1 link toencyclopedia-of-geosciences.net
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
Bing
Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
DuckDuckGo

Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
Abstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
General Meta Tags
142- titleACP - Peer review - Technical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
- Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
- charsetutf-8
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
- theme-color#000000
Open Graph Meta Tags
4- og:imagehttps://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4523/2022/acp-22-4523-2022-avatar-web.png
- og:titleTechnical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
- og:descriptionAbstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
- og:urlhttps://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4523/2022/
Twitter Meta Tags
3- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:titleTechnical note: Parameterising cloud base updraft velocity of marine stratocumuli
- twitter:descriptionAbstract. The number of cloud droplets formed at the cloud base depends on both the properties of aerosol particles and the updraft velocity of an air parcel at the cloud base. As the spatial scale of updrafts is too small to be resolved in global atmospheric models, the updraft velocity is commonly parameterised based on the available turbulent kinetic energy. Here we present alternative methods through parameterising updraft velocity based on high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) runs in the case of marine stratocumulus clouds. First we use our simulations to assess the accuracy of a simple linear parameterisation where the updraft velocity depends only on cloud top radiative cooling. In addition, we present two different machine learning methods (Gaussian process emulation and random forest) that account for different boundary layer conditions and cloud properties. We conclude that both machine learning parameterisations reproduce the LES-based updraft velocities at about the same accuracy, while the simple approach employing radiative cooling only produces on average lower coefficient of determination and higher root mean square error values. Finally, we apply these machine learning methods to find the key parameters affecting cloud base updraft velocities.
Link Tags
39- apple-touch-icon-precomposedhttps://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_180x180_.png
- apple-touch-icon-precomposedhttps://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_120x120_.png
- apple-touch-icon-precomposedhttps://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_152x152_.png
- apple-touch-icon-precomposedhttps://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_76x76_.png
- apple-touch-icon-precomposedhttps://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/favicon_copernicus_57x57_.ico
Emails
1Links
112- http://www.egu.eu
- https://acp.copernicus.org
- https://acp.copernicus.org/acp_letters.html
- https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4523/2022/acp-22-4523-2022-assets.html
- https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4523/2022/acp-22-4523-2022-discussion.html