doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031961
Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.
Linked Hostnames
15- 23 links todoi.org
- 10 links toabout.zenodo.org
- 3 links tohelp.zenodo.org
- 2 links todevelopers.zenodo.org
- 2 links tohome.cern
- 2 links tozenodo.org
- 1 link toblog.zenodo.org
- 1 link tocommission.europa.eu
Search Engine Appearance
Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist
Bing
Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist
DuckDuckGo
Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist
General Meta Tags
17- titleTest set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
- charsetutf-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
- google-site-verification5fPGCLllnWrvFxH9QWI0l1TadV7byeEvfPcyK2VkS_s
Open Graph Meta Tags
4- og:titleTest set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
- og:descriptionSet of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist
- og:urlhttps://zenodo.org/records/4031961
- og:site_nameZenodo
Twitter Meta Tags
4- twitter:cardsummary
- twitter:site@zenodo_org
- twitter:titleTest set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
- twitter:descriptionSet of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist
Link Tags
15- alternatehttps://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/ligand_properties.csv
- alternatehttps://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/README.md
- alternatehttps://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/data.zip
- alternatehttps://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/atoms_vs_rotbonds.png
- apple-touch-icon/static/apple-touch-icon-120.png
Links
51- https://about.zenodo.org
- https://about.zenodo.org/contact
- https://about.zenodo.org/cookie-policy
- https://about.zenodo.org/infrastructure
- https://about.zenodo.org/policies