doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031961

Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

15

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031961

Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU

Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score   * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist  



Bing

Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031961

Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score   * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist  



DuckDuckGo

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4031961

Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU

Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score   * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist  

  • General Meta Tags

    17
    • title
      Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
    • charset
      utf-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
    • google-site-verification
      5fPGCLllnWrvFxH9QWI0l1TadV7byeEvfPcyK2VkS_s
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    4
    • og:title
      Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
    • og:description
      Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score   * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist  
    • og:url
      https://zenodo.org/records/4031961
    • og:site_name
      Zenodo
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    4
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:site
      @zenodo_org
    • twitter:title
      Test set of 140 complexes for AutoDock-GPU
    • twitter:description
      Set of 140 protein-ligand complexes =================================== # Overview The ligands herein vary in the number of atoms and number of rotatable bonds. This is the full data set used in the following study: Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search https://dx.doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9702389.v1 # Warning These structures, both proteins and ligands, were prepared in an automated way without manual inspection. The following is a non-comprehensive list of issues that may exist: * missing water molecules that bridge ligand-receptor interactions, * missing atoms in the proteins, * non-integer sum of partial charges, * incorrect protonation state, * incorrect protein conformations. This intended use of this data is to evaluate the performance of docking with regard to computational and algorithmic efficiency, but not the accuracy of the scoring function. # Details In ligand\_properties.csv * `pdb` Protein Data Bank accession code * `n_atom` number of atoms in the ligand * `n_tors` number of bonds in the ligand that can rotate during docking. * `score_of_probable_global_minimum` lowest (best) score (score is the sum of intra- and inter-mo leculer energy components). The best score did not improve with an increase in the search effort * `RMSD_of_probable_global_minimum` RMSD from X-ray pose for the solution with the lowst score   * `best_score_so_far` lowest score ever found but even lower scores are likely to exist  
  • Link Tags

    15
    • alternate
      https://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/ligand_properties.csv
    • alternate
      https://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/README.md
    • alternate
      https://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/data.zip
    • alternate
      https://zenodo.org/records/4031961/files/atoms_vs_rotbonds.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      /static/apple-touch-icon-120.png

Links

51