dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2018/09/28/the-relative-performance-of-c-and-rust

Preview meta tags from the dtrace.org website.

Linked Hostnames

12
  • General Meta Tags

    19
    • title
      The relative performance of C and Rust | The Observation Deck
    • title
      Home
    • title
      Menu
    • title
      LIGHT
    • title
      DARK
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    13
    • og:title
      The relative performance of C and Rust | The Observation Deck
    • og:site_name
    • og:description
    • og:locale
      en-us
    • og:type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    5
    • twitter:title
      The relative performance of C and Rust | The Observation Deck
    • twitter:description
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:title
      The relative performance of C and Rust
    • twitter:description
      My blog post on falling in love with Rust got quite a bit of attention – with many being surprised by what had surprised me as well: the high performance of my naive Rust versus my (putatively less naive?) C. However, others viewed it as irresponsible to report these performance differences, believing that these results would be blown out of proportion or worse. The concern is not entirely misplaced: system benchmarking is one of those areas where – in Jonathan Swift’s words from three centuries ago – “falsehood flies, and the truth comes limping after it.”
  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    2
    • name
      The relative performance of C and Rust | The Observation Deck
    • description
  • Link Tags

    10
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2018/09/28/the-relative-performance-of-c-and-rust/
    • icon
      /icons/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /icons/favicon-16x16.png
    • icon
      /icons/favicon.svg
  • Website Locales

    1
    • US country flagen-us
      https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2018/09/28/the-relative-performance-of-c-and-rust/

Links

28