dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0474-5

Preview meta tags from the dx.doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

22

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0474-5

A theory of structural determination - Philosophical Studies

While structural equations modeling is increasingly used in philosophical theorizing about causation, it remains unclear what it takes for a particular str



Bing

A theory of structural determination - Philosophical Studies

https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0474-5

While structural equations modeling is increasingly used in philosophical theorizing about causation, it remains unclear what it takes for a particular str



DuckDuckGo

https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0474-5

A theory of structural determination - Philosophical Studies

While structural equations modeling is increasingly used in philosophical theorizing about causation, it remains unclear what it takes for a particular str

  • General Meta Tags

    109
    • title
      A theory of structural determination | Philosophical Studies
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • applicable-device
      pc,mobile
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:url
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-015-0474-5
    • og:type
      article
    • og:site_name
      SpringerLink
    • og:title
      A theory of structural determination - Philosophical Studies
    • og:description
      While structural equations modeling is increasingly used in philosophical theorizing about causation, it remains unclear what it takes for a particular structural equations model to be correct. To the extent that this issue has been addressed, the consensus appears to be that it takes a certain family of causal counterfactuals being true. I argue that this account faces difficulties in securing the independent manipulability of the structural determination relations represented in a correct structural equations model. I then offer an alternate understanding of structural determination, and I demonstrate that this theory guarantees that structural determination relations are independently manipulable. The account provides a straightforward way of understanding hypothetical interventions, as well as a criterion for distinguishing hypothetical changes in the values of variables which constitute interventions from those which do not. It additionally affords a semantics for causal counterfactual conditionals which is able to yield a clean solution to a problem case for the standard ‘closest possible world’ semantics.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    6
    • twitter:site
      @SpringerLink
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:image:alt
      Content cover image
    • twitter:title
      A theory of structural determination
    • twitter:description
      Philosophical Studies - While structural equations modeling is increasingly used in philosophical theorizing about causation, it remains unclear what it takes for a particular structural equations...
  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    3
    • position
      1
    • position
      2
    • position
      3
  • Link Tags

    9
    • apple-touch-icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/apple-touch-icon-6ef0829b9c.png
    • canonical
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-015-0474-5
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/android-chrome-192x192.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-16x16.png

Emails

1

Links

134