dx.doi.org/10.1051/gse:2007029
Preview meta tags from the dx.doi.org website.
Linked Hostnames
16- 40 links towww.biomedcentral.com
- 38 links toscholar.google.co.uk
- 38 links towww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 23 links todx.doi.org
- 3 links towww.springernature.com
- 1 link toauthorservices.springernature.com
- 1 link tobiomedcentral.typeform.com
- 1 link toblogs.biomedcentral.com
Thumbnail
Search Engine Appearance
Analysis of the real EADGENE data set: Comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (Open Access publication) - Genetics Selection Evolution
A large variety of methods has been proposed in the literature for microarray data analysis. The aim of this paper was to present techniques used by the EADGENE (European Animal Disease Genomics Network of Excellence) WP1.4 participants for data quality control, normalisation and statistical methods for the detection of differentially expressed genes in order to provide some more general data analysis guidelines. All the workshop participants were given a real data set obtained in an EADGENE funded microarray study looking at the gene expression changes following artificial infection with two different mastitis causing bacteria: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. It was reassuring to see that most of the teams found the same main biological results. In fact, most of the differentially expressed genes were found for infection by E. coli between uninfected and 24 h challenged udder quarters. Very little transcriptional variation was observed for the bacteria S. aureus. Lists of differentially expressed genes found by the different research teams were, however, quite dependent on the method used, especially concerning the data quality control step. These analyses also emphasised a biological problem of cross-talk between infected and uninfected quarters which will have to be dealt with for further microarray studies.
Bing
Analysis of the real EADGENE data set: Comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (Open Access publication) - Genetics Selection Evolution
A large variety of methods has been proposed in the literature for microarray data analysis. The aim of this paper was to present techniques used by the EADGENE (European Animal Disease Genomics Network of Excellence) WP1.4 participants for data quality control, normalisation and statistical methods for the detection of differentially expressed genes in order to provide some more general data analysis guidelines. All the workshop participants were given a real data set obtained in an EADGENE funded microarray study looking at the gene expression changes following artificial infection with two different mastitis causing bacteria: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. It was reassuring to see that most of the teams found the same main biological results. In fact, most of the differentially expressed genes were found for infection by E. coli between uninfected and 24 h challenged udder quarters. Very little transcriptional variation was observed for the bacteria S. aureus. Lists of differentially expressed genes found by the different research teams were, however, quite dependent on the method used, especially concerning the data quality control step. These analyses also emphasised a biological problem of cross-talk between infected and uninfected quarters which will have to be dealt with for further microarray studies.
DuckDuckGo
Analysis of the real EADGENE data set: Comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (Open Access publication) - Genetics Selection Evolution
A large variety of methods has been proposed in the literature for microarray data analysis. The aim of this paper was to present techniques used by the EADGENE (European Animal Disease Genomics Network of Excellence) WP1.4 participants for data quality control, normalisation and statistical methods for the detection of differentially expressed genes in order to provide some more general data analysis guidelines. All the workshop participants were given a real data set obtained in an EADGENE funded microarray study looking at the gene expression changes following artificial infection with two different mastitis causing bacteria: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. It was reassuring to see that most of the teams found the same main biological results. In fact, most of the differentially expressed genes were found for infection by E. coli between uninfected and 24 h challenged udder quarters. Very little transcriptional variation was observed for the bacteria S. aureus. Lists of differentially expressed genes found by the different research teams were, however, quite dependent on the method used, especially concerning the data quality control step. These analyses also emphasised a biological problem of cross-talk between infected and uninfected quarters which will have to be dealt with for further microarray studies.
General Meta Tags
176- titleAnalysis of the real EADGENE data set: Comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (Open Access publication) | Genetics Selection Evolution | Full Text
- charsetUTF-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- applicable-devicepc,mobile
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
Open Graph Meta Tags
6- og:urlhttps://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1297-9686-39-6-633
- og:typearticle
- og:site_nameBioMed Central
- og:titleAnalysis of the real EADGENE data set: Comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (Open Access publication) - Genetics Selection Evolution
- og:descriptionA large variety of methods has been proposed in the literature for microarray data analysis. The aim of this paper was to present techniques used by the EADGENE (European Animal Disease Genomics Network of Excellence) WP1.4 participants for data quality control, normalisation and statistical methods for the detection of differentially expressed genes in order to provide some more general data analysis guidelines. All the workshop participants were given a real data set obtained in an EADGENE funded microarray study looking at the gene expression changes following artificial infection with two different mastitis causing bacteria: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. It was reassuring to see that most of the teams found the same main biological results. In fact, most of the differentially expressed genes were found for infection by E. coli between uninfected and 24 h challenged udder quarters. Very little transcriptional variation was observed for the bacteria S. aureus. Lists of differentially expressed genes found by the different research teams were, however, quite dependent on the method used, especially concerning the data quality control step. These analyses also emphasised a biological problem of cross-talk between infected and uninfected quarters which will have to be dealt with for further microarray studies.
Link Tags
12- apple-touch-icon/static/img/favicons/bmc/apple-touch-icon-582ef1d0f5.png
- canonicalhttps://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1297-9686-39-6-633
- icon/static/img/favicons/bmc/android-chrome-192x192-9625b7cdba.png
- icon/static/img/favicons/bmc/favicon-32x32-5d7879efe1.png
- icon/static/img/favicons/bmc/favicon-16x16-c241ac1a2f.png
Emails
2Links
153- http://www.weibo.com/biomedcentral
- https://authorservices.springernature.com/go/sn/?utm_source=Website&utm_medium=BMC&utm_campaign=SNAS+Referrals+2022&utm_id=ref2022
- https://biomedcentral.typeform.com/to/VLXboo
- https://blogs.biomedcentral.com
- https://citation-needed.springer.com/v2/references/10.1186/1297-9686-39-6-633?format=refman&flavour=citation