eprint.iacr.org/2024/757

Preview meta tags from the eprint.iacr.org website.

Linked Hostnames

5

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/757

Formal Definition and Verification for Combined Random Fault and Random Probing Security

In our highly digitalized world, an adversary is not constrained to purely digital attacks but can monitor or influence the physical execution environment of a target computing device. Such side-channel or fault-injection analysis poses a significant threat to otherwise secure cryptographic implementations. Hence, it is important to consider additional adversarial capabilities when analyzing the security of cryptographic implementations besides the default black-box model. For side-channel analysis, this is done by providing the adversary with knowledge of some internal values, while for fault-injection analysis the capabilities of the adversaries include manipulation of some internal values. In this work, we extend probabilistic security models for physical attacks, by introducing a general random probing model and a general random fault model to capture arbitrary leakage and fault distributions, as well as the combination of these models. Our aim is to enable a more accurate modeling of low-level physical effects. We then analyze important properties, such as the impact of adversarial knowledge on faults and compositions, and provide tool-based formal verification methods that allow the security assessment of design components. These methods are introduced as extension of previous tools VERICA and IronMask which are implemented, evaluated and compared.



Bing

Formal Definition and Verification for Combined Random Fault and Random Probing Security

https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/757

In our highly digitalized world, an adversary is not constrained to purely digital attacks but can monitor or influence the physical execution environment of a target computing device. Such side-channel or fault-injection analysis poses a significant threat to otherwise secure cryptographic implementations. Hence, it is important to consider additional adversarial capabilities when analyzing the security of cryptographic implementations besides the default black-box model. For side-channel analysis, this is done by providing the adversary with knowledge of some internal values, while for fault-injection analysis the capabilities of the adversaries include manipulation of some internal values. In this work, we extend probabilistic security models for physical attacks, by introducing a general random probing model and a general random fault model to capture arbitrary leakage and fault distributions, as well as the combination of these models. Our aim is to enable a more accurate modeling of low-level physical effects. We then analyze important properties, such as the impact of adversarial knowledge on faults and compositions, and provide tool-based formal verification methods that allow the security assessment of design components. These methods are introduced as extension of previous tools VERICA and IronMask which are implemented, evaluated and compared.



DuckDuckGo

https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/757

Formal Definition and Verification for Combined Random Fault and Random Probing Security

In our highly digitalized world, an adversary is not constrained to purely digital attacks but can monitor or influence the physical execution environment of a target computing device. Such side-channel or fault-injection analysis poses a significant threat to otherwise secure cryptographic implementations. Hence, it is important to consider additional adversarial capabilities when analyzing the security of cryptographic implementations besides the default black-box model. For side-channel analysis, this is done by providing the adversary with knowledge of some internal values, while for fault-injection analysis the capabilities of the adversaries include manipulation of some internal values. In this work, we extend probabilistic security models for physical attacks, by introducing a general random probing model and a general random fault model to capture arbitrary leakage and fault distributions, as well as the combination of these models. Our aim is to enable a more accurate modeling of low-level physical effects. We then analyze important properties, such as the impact of adversarial knowledge on faults and compositions, and provide tool-based formal verification methods that allow the security assessment of design components. These methods are introduced as extension of previous tools VERICA and IronMask which are implemented, evaluated and compared.

  • General Meta Tags

    24
    • title
      Formal Definition and Verification for Combined Random Fault and Random Probing Security
    • charset
      utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no
    • citation_title
      Formal Definition and Verification for Combined Random Fault and Random Probing Security
    • citation_author
      Sonia Belaid
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://eprint.iacr.org/img/iacrlogo.png
    • og:image:alt
      IACR logo
    • og:url
      https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/757
    • og:site_name
      IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
    • og:type
      article
  • Link Tags

    2
    • stylesheet
      /css/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css
    • stylesheet
      /css/eprint.css?v=10

Links

36