gh.bmj.com/content/6/11/e007853

Preview meta tags from the gh.bmj.com website.

Linked Hostnames

17

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/11/e007853

Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead

This year marks the fifth anniversary of the publication of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines,1 which provide recommendations to authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and publishers for ensuring that sex and gender considerations are appropriately reported in the scholarly literature. The guidelines were developed in recognition of the persistent sex and gender gaps in research across disciplines, especially in health and biomedical research. At the time of development, there was notable resistance to implement sex and gender policies, reflecting a lack of awareness of the importance of sex and gender as critical determinants of health and well-being.2 The guidelines have now been translated into six languages, adopted by a growing number of journals, encouraged by major publishers, and extensively used by researchers.3 Despite these successes and growing awareness, there remain critical barriers to systematic implementation of sex-based and gender-based analyses in research and reporting. For example, many COVID-19 trials continue to include fewer women than men,4 and there is a persistent lack of sex-based and gender-based …



Bing

Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead

https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/11/e007853

This year marks the fifth anniversary of the publication of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines,1 which provide recommendations to authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and publishers for ensuring that sex and gender considerations are appropriately reported in the scholarly literature. The guidelines were developed in recognition of the persistent sex and gender gaps in research across disciplines, especially in health and biomedical research. At the time of development, there was notable resistance to implement sex and gender policies, reflecting a lack of awareness of the importance of sex and gender as critical determinants of health and well-being.2 The guidelines have now been translated into six languages, adopted by a growing number of journals, encouraged by major publishers, and extensively used by researchers.3 Despite these successes and growing awareness, there remain critical barriers to systematic implementation of sex-based and gender-based analyses in research and reporting. For example, many COVID-19 trials continue to include fewer women than men,4 and there is a persistent lack of sex-based and gender-based …



DuckDuckGo

https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/11/e007853

Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead

This year marks the fifth anniversary of the publication of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines,1 which provide recommendations to authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and publishers for ensuring that sex and gender considerations are appropriately reported in the scholarly literature. The guidelines were developed in recognition of the persistent sex and gender gaps in research across disciplines, especially in health and biomedical research. At the time of development, there was notable resistance to implement sex and gender policies, reflecting a lack of awareness of the importance of sex and gender as critical determinants of health and well-being.2 The guidelines have now been translated into six languages, adopted by a growing number of journals, encouraged by major publishers, and extensively used by researchers.3 Despite these successes and growing awareness, there remain critical barriers to systematic implementation of sex-based and gender-based analyses in research and reporting. For example, many COVID-19 trials continue to include fewer women than men,4 and there is a persistent lack of sex-based and gender-based …

  • General Meta Tags

    85
    • title
      Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead | BMJ Global Health
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
    • type
      article
    • category
      editorial
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og-title
      Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead
    • og-url
      https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/11/e007853
    • og-site-name
      BMJ Global Health
    • og-description
      This year marks the fifth anniversary of the publication of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines,1 which provide recommendations to authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and publishers for ensuring that sex and gender considerations are appropriately reported in the scholarly literature. The guidelines were developed in recognition of the persistent sex and gender gaps in research across disciplines, especially in health and biomedical research. At the time of development, there was notable resistance to implement sex and gender policies, reflecting a lack of awareness of the importance of sex and gender as critical determinants of health and well-being.2 The guidelines have now been translated into six languages, adopted by a growing number of journals, encouraged by major publishers, and extensively used by researchers.3 Despite these successes and growing awareness, there remain critical barriers to systematic implementation of sex-based and gender-based analyses in research and reporting. For example, many COVID-19 trials continue to include fewer women than men,4 and there is a persistent lack of sex-based and gender-based …
    • og-type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    3
    • twitter:title
      Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:description
      This year marks the fifth anniversary of the publication of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines,1 which provide recommendations to authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and publishers for ensuring that sex and gender considerations are appropriately reported in the scholarly literature. The guidelines were developed in recognition of the persistent sex and gender gaps in research across disciplines, especially in health and biomedical research. At the time of development, there was notable resistance to implement sex and gender policies, reflecting a lack of awareness of the importance of sex and gender as critical determinants of health and well-being.2 The guidelines have now been translated into six languages, adopted by a growing number of journals, encouraged by major publishers, and extensively used by researchers.3 Despite these successes and growing awareness, there remain critical barriers to systematic implementation of sex-based and gender-based analyses in research and reporting. For example, many COVID-19 trials continue to include fewer women than men,4 and there is a persistent lack of sex-based and gender-based …
  • Link Tags

    9
    • alternate
      /content/6/11/e007853.full.pdf
    • alternate
      /content/6/11/e007853.full.txt
    • canonical
      https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/11/e007853
    • shortcut icon
      https://gh.bmj.com/sites/default/themes/bmjj/favicon.ico
    • stylesheet
      /sites/default/files/advagg_css/css__zEtNwUu9MaBwPq3JhYABsUEb8zJetUS42Q04qTPWDcc__wUr2GCCXq5CGuNFk2jmV52iytGLjUd7dn7guJp7QOB0__bZd6Rdt0lyZ1Kq8nMr_408KjJQuTXHzqxoT4RfzmZtk.css

Links

80