link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-008-9097-3

Preview meta tags from the link.springer.com website.

Linked Hostnames

22

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-008-9097-3

The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence - Minds and Machines

In artificial intelligence (AI), a number of criticisms were raised against the use of probability for dealing with uncertainty. All these criticisms, exce



Bing

The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence - Minds and Machines

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-008-9097-3

In artificial intelligence (AI), a number of criticisms were raised against the use of probability for dealing with uncertainty. All these criticisms, exce



DuckDuckGo

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-008-9097-3

The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence - Minds and Machines

In artificial intelligence (AI), a number of criticisms were raised against the use of probability for dealing with uncertainty. All these criticisms, exce

  • General Meta Tags

    113
    • title
      The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence | Minds and Machines
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • applicable-device
      pc,mobile
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:url
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-008-9097-3
    • og:type
      article
    • og:site_name
      SpringerLink
    • og:title
      The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence - Minds and Machines
    • og:description
      In artificial intelligence (AI), a number of criticisms were raised against the use of probability for dealing with uncertainty. All these criticisms, except what in this article we call the non-adequacy claim, have been eventually confuted. The non-adequacy claim is an exception because, unlike the other criticisms, it is exquisitely philosophical and, possibly for this reason, it was not discussed in the technical literature. A lack of clarity and understanding of this claim had a major impact on AI. Indeed, mostly leaning on this claim, some scientists developed an alternative research direction and, as a result, the AI community split in two schools: a probabilistic and an alternative one. In this article, we argue that the non-adequacy claim has a strongly metaphysical character and, as such, should not be accepted as a conclusive argument against the adequacy of probability.

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    6
    • twitter:site
      @SpringerLink
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:image:alt
      Content cover image
    • twitter:title
      The Metaphysical Character of the Criticisms Raised Against the Use of Probability for Dealing with Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
    • twitter:description
      Minds and Machines - In artificial intelligence (AI), a number of criticisms were raised against the use of probability for dealing with uncertainty. All these criticisms, except what in this...

  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    3
    • position
      1
    • position
      2
    • position
      3

  • Link Tags

    9
    • apple-touch-icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/apple-touch-icon-6ef0829b9c.png
    • canonical
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-008-9097-3
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/android-chrome-192x192.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-16x16.png

Emails

1

Links

145