link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0245-9

Preview meta tags from the link.springer.com website.

Linked Hostnames

20

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0245-9

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument - Synthese

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living i



Bing

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument - Synthese

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0245-9

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living i



DuckDuckGo

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0245-9

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument - Synthese

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living i

  • General Meta Tags

    82
    • title
      The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument | Synthese
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • applicable-device
      pc,mobile
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:url
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0245-9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:site_name
      SpringerLink
    • og:title
      The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument - Synthese
    • og:description
      The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living in a computer simulation, Philosophical Quarterly, 53:243–255; Aranyosi 2004, The Doomsday Simulation Argument. Or why isn’t the end nigh, and you’re not living in a simulation, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/190/ ; Richmond 2008, Doomsday, Bishop Ussher and simulated worlds, Ratio, 21:201–217; Bostrom and Kulczycki 2011 A patch for the Simulation Argument, Analysis, 71:54–61). Both are cases where reflecting on one’s location among a set of possibilities yields a counter-intuitive conclusion—in the first case that the end of humankind is closer than you initially thought, and in the second case that it is more likely than you initially thought that you are living in a computer simulation. Indeed, the two arguments do have some structural similarities. But there are also significant disanalogies between the two arguments, and I argue that these disanalogies mean that the Simulation Argument succeeds and the Doomsday Argument fails.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    6
    • twitter:site
      @SpringerLink
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:image:alt
      Content cover image
    • twitter:title
      The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument
    • twitter:description
      Synthese - The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living in a computer simulation,...
  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    3
    • position
      1
    • position
      2
    • position
      3
  • Link Tags

    9
    • apple-touch-icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/apple-touch-icon-6ef0829b9c.png
    • canonical
      https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0245-9
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/android-chrome-192x192.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      /oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-16x16.png

Emails

1

Links

91