math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Does_direct_proportion_need_to_have_a_slope_of_1

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Does_direct_proportion_need_to_have_a_slope_of_1

Does direct proportion need to have a slope of 1? - Answers

No, direct proportion does not necessarily need to have a slope of 1. A direct proportionality relationship means that as one variable increases, the other variable increases at a constant rate, which can be represented by the equation (y = kx), where (k) is a constant. If (k = 1), the slope will be 1, but any positive value of (k) will still represent a direct proportion, just with a steeper or shallower slope.



Bing

Does direct proportion need to have a slope of 1? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Does_direct_proportion_need_to_have_a_slope_of_1

No, direct proportion does not necessarily need to have a slope of 1. A direct proportionality relationship means that as one variable increases, the other variable increases at a constant rate, which can be represented by the equation (y = kx), where (k) is a constant. If (k = 1), the slope will be 1, but any positive value of (k) will still represent a direct proportion, just with a steeper or shallower slope.



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Does_direct_proportion_need_to_have_a_slope_of_1

Does direct proportion need to have a slope of 1? - Answers

No, direct proportion does not necessarily need to have a slope of 1. A direct proportionality relationship means that as one variable increases, the other variable increases at a constant rate, which can be represented by the equation (y = kx), where (k) is a constant. If (k = 1), the slope will be 1, but any positive value of (k) will still represent a direct proportion, just with a steeper or shallower slope.

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      Does direct proportion need to have a slope of 1? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      No, direct proportion does not necessarily need to have a slope of 1. A direct proportionality relationship means that as one variable increases, the other variable increases at a constant rate, which can be represented by the equation (y = kx), where (k) is a constant. If (k = 1), the slope will be 1, but any positive value of (k) will still represent a direct proportion, just with a steeper or shallower slope.

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image

  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Does_direct_proportion_need_to_have_a_slope_of_1
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

58