math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_many_12_x_12_tiles_to_cover_220_sq_ft
Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.
Linked Hostnames
8- 34 links tomath.answers.com
- 18 links towww.answers.com
- 1 link totwitter.com
- 1 link towww.facebook.com
- 1 link towww.instagram.com
- 1 link towww.pinterest.com
- 1 link towww.tiktok.com
- 1 link towww.youtube.com
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
How many 12 x 12 tiles to cover 220 sq ft? - Answers
It depends, first of all on the dimensions of each tile. The question states that the tiles are 12 x 12 but gives no indication whether those measures are inches or centimetres. Assume, that the measurements ARE 12 inches x 12 inches. Then each tile has an area of 1 ft x 1 ft which is 1 sq ft. The minimum number of tiles required to cover 220 square feet = 220/1 = 220. However, that requires the further assumption that the area is well behaved and that there is no wastage. Unless the area is in the form of a rectangle with sides that are a whole number of feet, that will not happen. And when you need to cut tiles, you will have breakages, cut-offs that cannot be used and so on. So, given two major assumptions, the answer is 220 tiles but, since neither assumption can be justified, I would suggest around 240 tiles.
Bing
How many 12 x 12 tiles to cover 220 sq ft? - Answers
It depends, first of all on the dimensions of each tile. The question states that the tiles are 12 x 12 but gives no indication whether those measures are inches or centimetres. Assume, that the measurements ARE 12 inches x 12 inches. Then each tile has an area of 1 ft x 1 ft which is 1 sq ft. The minimum number of tiles required to cover 220 square feet = 220/1 = 220. However, that requires the further assumption that the area is well behaved and that there is no wastage. Unless the area is in the form of a rectangle with sides that are a whole number of feet, that will not happen. And when you need to cut tiles, you will have breakages, cut-offs that cannot be used and so on. So, given two major assumptions, the answer is 220 tiles but, since neither assumption can be justified, I would suggest around 240 tiles.
DuckDuckGo
How many 12 x 12 tiles to cover 220 sq ft? - Answers
It depends, first of all on the dimensions of each tile. The question states that the tiles are 12 x 12 but gives no indication whether those measures are inches or centimetres. Assume, that the measurements ARE 12 inches x 12 inches. Then each tile has an area of 1 ft x 1 ft which is 1 sq ft. The minimum number of tiles required to cover 220 square feet = 220/1 = 220. However, that requires the further assumption that the area is well behaved and that there is no wastage. Unless the area is in the form of a rectangle with sides that are a whole number of feet, that will not happen. And when you need to cut tiles, you will have breakages, cut-offs that cannot be used and so on. So, given two major assumptions, the answer is 220 tiles but, since neither assumption can be justified, I would suggest around 240 tiles.
General Meta Tags
22- titleHow many 12 x 12 tiles to cover 220 sq ft? - Answers
- charsetutf-8
- Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
- viewportminimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge,chrome=1
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:imagehttps://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
- og:image:width900
- og:image:height900
- og:site_nameAnswers
- og:descriptionIt depends, first of all on the dimensions of each tile. The question states that the tiles are 12 x 12 but gives no indication whether those measures are inches or centimetres. Assume, that the measurements ARE 12 inches x 12 inches. Then each tile has an area of 1 ft x 1 ft which is 1 sq ft. The minimum number of tiles required to cover 220 square feet = 220/1 = 220. However, that requires the further assumption that the area is well behaved and that there is no wastage. Unless the area is in the form of a rectangle with sides that are a whole number of feet, that will not happen. And when you need to cut tiles, you will have breakages, cut-offs that cannot be used and so on. So, given two major assumptions, the answer is 220 tiles but, since neither assumption can be justified, I would suggest around 240 tiles.
Twitter Meta Tags
1- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
Link Tags
16- alternatehttps://www.answers.com/feed.rss
- apple-touch-icon/icons/180x180.png
- canonicalhttps://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_many_12_x_12_tiles_to_cover_220_sq_ft
- icon/favicon.svg
- icon/icons/16x16.png
Links
58- https://math.answers.com
- https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Give_the_place_value_of_the_6_in_351.06
- https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_spell_349_in_English
- https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_write_seven_four_one_four_two_four_two
- https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_important_are_information_systems_in_solving_the_problems_of_the_American_automobile_industry