open.spotify.com/episode/1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wy
Preview meta tags from the open.spotify.com website.
Linked Hostnames
1Thumbnail
Search Engine Appearance
How Originalism in the Court Directly Impacts Americans’ Health and Rights
Listen to this episode from rePROs Fight Back on Spotify. In the past month, the Supreme Court has interacted with three cases that have stark implications for the reproductive health, rights, and wellbeing of many across the U.S. Madiba Dennie, author of The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take it Back and Deputy Editor and Senior Contributor at the legal commentary outlet Balls and Strikes, sits down to talk to us about originalism, the recent Supreme Court case rulings, and what it all means for the sexual and reproductive health and rights of Americans.On June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine—which challenged access to nationwide medication abortion—did not have a legal standing. For now, this ruling preserves the post-Dobbs status-quo, protecting access to mifepristone, a safe and common medication used in nearly two-thirds of abortions, in some states. On June 21, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Rahimi to prevent those with previous domestic violence restraining orders filed against them to possess firearms. And on June 27th, the Supreme Court dismissed a case that would have prevented abortion in the case of medical emergency in Idaho. Access remains protected—for now. Many of the recent Supreme Court cases are rooted in originalism, or the application of U.S. “history” and “tradition” to undermine rights, which has been a trusted roadmap for anti-rights actors in the courts.For more information, check out Pantsuit Politics: https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/s/podcastSupport the showFollow Us on Social: Twitter: @rePROsFightBack Instagram: @reprosfbFacebook: rePROs Fight Back Bluesky: @reprosfightback.bsky.social Buy rePROs Merch: Bonfire store Email us: [email protected] and Review on Apple PodcastThanks for listening & keep fighting back!
Bing
How Originalism in the Court Directly Impacts Americans’ Health and Rights
Listen to this episode from rePROs Fight Back on Spotify. In the past month, the Supreme Court has interacted with three cases that have stark implications for the reproductive health, rights, and wellbeing of many across the U.S. Madiba Dennie, author of The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take it Back and Deputy Editor and Senior Contributor at the legal commentary outlet Balls and Strikes, sits down to talk to us about originalism, the recent Supreme Court case rulings, and what it all means for the sexual and reproductive health and rights of Americans.On June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine—which challenged access to nationwide medication abortion—did not have a legal standing. For now, this ruling preserves the post-Dobbs status-quo, protecting access to mifepristone, a safe and common medication used in nearly two-thirds of abortions, in some states. On June 21, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Rahimi to prevent those with previous domestic violence restraining orders filed against them to possess firearms. And on June 27th, the Supreme Court dismissed a case that would have prevented abortion in the case of medical emergency in Idaho. Access remains protected—for now. Many of the recent Supreme Court cases are rooted in originalism, or the application of U.S. “history” and “tradition” to undermine rights, which has been a trusted roadmap for anti-rights actors in the courts.For more information, check out Pantsuit Politics: https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/s/podcastSupport the showFollow Us on Social: Twitter: @rePROsFightBack Instagram: @reprosfbFacebook: rePROs Fight Back Bluesky: @reprosfightback.bsky.social Buy rePROs Merch: Bonfire store Email us: [email protected] and Review on Apple PodcastThanks for listening & keep fighting back!
DuckDuckGo
How Originalism in the Court Directly Impacts Americans’ Health and Rights
Listen to this episode from rePROs Fight Back on Spotify. In the past month, the Supreme Court has interacted with three cases that have stark implications for the reproductive health, rights, and wellbeing of many across the U.S. Madiba Dennie, author of The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take it Back and Deputy Editor and Senior Contributor at the legal commentary outlet Balls and Strikes, sits down to talk to us about originalism, the recent Supreme Court case rulings, and what it all means for the sexual and reproductive health and rights of Americans.On June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine—which challenged access to nationwide medication abortion—did not have a legal standing. For now, this ruling preserves the post-Dobbs status-quo, protecting access to mifepristone, a safe and common medication used in nearly two-thirds of abortions, in some states. On June 21, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Rahimi to prevent those with previous domestic violence restraining orders filed against them to possess firearms. And on June 27th, the Supreme Court dismissed a case that would have prevented abortion in the case of medical emergency in Idaho. Access remains protected—for now. Many of the recent Supreme Court cases are rooted in originalism, or the application of U.S. “history” and “tradition” to undermine rights, which has been a trusted roadmap for anti-rights actors in the courts.For more information, check out Pantsuit Politics: https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/s/podcastSupport the showFollow Us on Social: Twitter: @rePROsFightBack Instagram: @reprosfbFacebook: rePROs Fight Back Bluesky: @reprosfightback.bsky.social Buy rePROs Merch: Bonfire store Email us: [email protected] and Review on Apple PodcastThanks for listening & keep fighting back!
General Meta Tags
15- titleHow Originalism in the Court Directly Impacts Americans’ Health and Rights - rePROs Fight Back | Podcast on Spotify
- charsetutf-8
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=9
- viewportwidth=device-width, initial-scale=1
- fb:app_id174829003346
Open Graph Meta Tags
179- og:site_nameSpotify
- og:titleHow Originalism in the Court Directly Impacts Americans’ Health and Rights
- og:descriptionrePROs Fight Back · Episode
- og:urlhttps://open.spotify.com/episode/1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wy
- og:typemusic.song
Twitter Meta Tags
5- twitter:site@spotify
- twitter:titleHow Originalism in the Court Directly Impacts Americans’ Health and Rights
- twitter:descriptionrePROs Fight Back · Episode
- twitter:imagehttps://i.scdn.co/image/ab6765630000ba8adc72761d6d550459335ff9dd
- twitter:cardsummary
Link Tags
31- alternatehttps://open.spotify.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopen.spotify.com%2Fepisode%2F1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wy
- alternateandroid-app://com.spotify.music/spotify/episode/1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wy
- canonicalhttps://open.spotify.com/episode/1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wy
- iconhttps://open.spotifycdn.com/cdn/images/favicon32.b64ecc03.png
- iconhttps://open.spotifycdn.com/cdn/images/favicon16.1c487bff.png
Website Locales
2en
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wyx-default
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1UzXPmgqdU1lIdhC0tV7wy
Links
9- https://open.spotify.com
- https://open.spotify.com/episode/2uZWXyJWApkKjsKmml8vqJ
- https://open.spotify.com/episode/3aYkrXcvUj74cjges6Oilf
- https://open.spotify.com/episode/3aoYABT7cu0te2kEcpIJsd
- https://open.spotify.com/episode/3iDmZ4xySa6QOSOrneJPP6