
serverfault.com/questions/305890/poor-linux-software-raid-5-performance-with-ncq
Preview meta tags from the serverfault.com website.
Linked Hostnames
41- 39 links toserverfault.com
- 9 links tostackexchange.com
- 7 links tostackoverflow.co
- 6 links tostackoverflow.com
- 3 links tostackoverflow.blog
- 2 links tochat.stackexchange.com
- 2 links todiy.stackexchange.com
- 2 links tomathoverflow.net
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
https://serverfault.com/questions/305890/poor-linux-software-raid-5-performance-with-ncq
Poor Linux software RAID 5 performance with NCQ
While salvaging a 2-disk failure in my 3-disk RAID 5 setup, I happened to notice reconstruction was faster with NCQ disabled (~90M/sec) than with the NCQ enabled (~50M/sec). Running bonnie++ to ben...
Bing
Poor Linux software RAID 5 performance with NCQ
https://serverfault.com/questions/305890/poor-linux-software-raid-5-performance-with-ncq
While salvaging a 2-disk failure in my 3-disk RAID 5 setup, I happened to notice reconstruction was faster with NCQ disabled (~90M/sec) than with the NCQ enabled (~50M/sec). Running bonnie++ to ben...
DuckDuckGo

Poor Linux software RAID 5 performance with NCQ
While salvaging a 2-disk failure in my 3-disk RAID 5 setup, I happened to notice reconstruction was faster with NCQ disabled (~90M/sec) than with the NCQ enabled (~50M/sec). Running bonnie++ to ben...
General Meta Tags
2- titlehard drive - Poor Linux software RAID 5 performance with NCQ - Server Fault
- viewportwidth=device-width, height=device-height, initial-scale=1.0, minimum-scale=1.0
Open Graph Meta Tags
6- og:typewebsite
- og:urlhttps://serverfault.com/questions/305890/poor-linux-software-raid-5-performance-with-ncq
- og:site_nameServer Fault
- og:imagehttps://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/serverfault/Img/[email protected]?v=9b1f48ae296b
- twitter:titlePoor Linux software RAID 5 performance with NCQ
Twitter Meta Tags
2- twitter:cardsummary
- twitter:domainserverfault.com
Link Tags
10- alternate/feeds/question/305890
- apple-touch-iconhttps://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/serverfault/Img/apple-touch-icon.png?v=6c3100d858bb
- canonicalhttps://serverfault.com/questions/305890/poor-linux-software-raid-5-performance-with-ncq
- image_srchttps://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/serverfault/Img/apple-touch-icon.png?v=6c3100d858bb
- search/opensearch.xml
Links
105- http://blog.nexcess.net/2010/11/07/changing-your-linux-io-scheduler
- http://blog.serverfault.com?blb=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Command_Queuing
- https://api.stackexchange.com
- https://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active