web.archive.org/web/20250126132817/https:/academia.stackexchange.com/questions/216345/do-reviewers-tend-to-reject-papers-when-they-do-not-fully-understand-parts-of

Preview meta tags from the web.archive.org website.

Linked Hostnames

1

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://web.archive.org/web/20250126132817/https:/academia.stackexchange.com/questions/216345/do-reviewers-tend-to-reject-papers-when-they-do-not-fully-understand-parts-of

Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it?

Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it? Such as when parts of the paper are not within the reviewer's immediate field of expertise? Although somewhat u...



Bing

Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it?

https://web.archive.org/web/20250126132817/https:/academia.stackexchange.com/questions/216345/do-reviewers-tend-to-reject-papers-when-they-do-not-fully-understand-parts-of

Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it? Such as when parts of the paper are not within the reviewer's immediate field of expertise? Although somewhat u...



DuckDuckGo

https://web.archive.org/web/20250126132817/https:/academia.stackexchange.com/questions/216345/do-reviewers-tend-to-reject-papers-when-they-do-not-fully-understand-parts-of

Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it?

Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it? Such as when parts of the paper are not within the reviewer's immediate field of expertise? Although somewhat u...

  • General Meta Tags

    3
    • title
      publications - Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it? - Academia Stack Exchange
    • viewport
      width=device-width, height=device-height, initial-scale=1.0, minimum-scale=1.0
    • bingbot
      noarchive

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:type
      website
    • og:url
      https://web.archive.org/web/20250126134253/https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/216345/do-reviewers-tend-to-reject-papers-when-they-do-not-fully-understand-parts-of
    • og:site_name
      Academia Stack Exchange
    • og:image
      https://web.archive.org/web/20250126134253im_/https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/academia/Img/[email protected]?v=7b0be71dac63
    • twitter:title
      Do reviewers tend to reject papers when they do not (fully) understand (parts of) it?

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    2
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:domain
      academia.stackexchange.com

  • Link Tags

    12
    • alternate
      /web/20250126134253/https://academia.stackexchange.com/feeds/question/216345
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://web.archive.org/web/20250126134253im_/https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/academia/Img/apple-touch-icon.png?v=1e8f0e15548a
    • canonical
      https://web.archive.org/web/20250126134253/https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/216345/do-reviewers-tend-to-reject-papers-when-they-do-not-fully-understand-parts-of
    • image_src
      https://web.archive.org/web/20250126134253im_/https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/academia/Img/apple-touch-icon.png?v=1e8f0e15548a
    • search
      /web/20250126134253/https://academia.stackexchange.com/opensearch.xml

Links

136