aella.substack.com/p/you-dont-need-a-perfectly-random/comment/10972327
Preview meta tags from the aella.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
bpanak on Knowingless
Good post. You are very good at survey methods and you will get multivariate regression and factor analysis in due time. Really nothing to critique in your essay, here is a man observation: if the critique is so broad and general that “anyone can say the sample is to [large / small / restrictive / biased / … ]” and the critic is not providing details on why the critique is relevant to the specific analysis or interpretation you are working on, then put little weight on that feedback. When the critique is targeted, backed up with citation or thoughts experiment that fits the situation, and paired with recommendations on how to improve your game, weigh that feedback more. Anyone who has taken one course in research methods can come up with 15 different “rival hypothses”, the good critic is one who is discerning and helpful and who critiques the most relevant issue with tact, like a good teacher would.
Bing
bpanak on Knowingless
Good post. You are very good at survey methods and you will get multivariate regression and factor analysis in due time. Really nothing to critique in your essay, here is a man observation: if the critique is so broad and general that “anyone can say the sample is to [large / small / restrictive / biased / … ]” and the critic is not providing details on why the critique is relevant to the specific analysis or interpretation you are working on, then put little weight on that feedback. When the critique is targeted, backed up with citation or thoughts experiment that fits the situation, and paired with recommendations on how to improve your game, weigh that feedback more. Anyone who has taken one course in research methods can come up with 15 different “rival hypothses”, the good critic is one who is discerning and helpful and who critiques the most relevant issue with tact, like a good teacher would.
DuckDuckGo
bpanak on Knowingless
Good post. You are very good at survey methods and you will get multivariate regression and factor analysis in due time. Really nothing to critique in your essay, here is a man observation: if the critique is so broad and general that “anyone can say the sample is to [large / small / restrictive / biased / … ]” and the critic is not providing details on why the critique is relevant to the specific analysis or interpretation you are working on, then put little weight on that feedback. When the critique is targeted, backed up with citation or thoughts experiment that fits the situation, and paired with recommendations on how to improve your game, weigh that feedback more. Anyone who has taken one course in research methods can come up with 15 different “rival hypothses”, the good critic is one who is discerning and helpful and who critiques the most relevant issue with tact, like a good teacher would.
General Meta Tags
16- titleComments - You don't need a perfectly random sample for useful data, jfc
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://aella.substack.com/p/you-dont-need-a-perfectly-random/comment/10972327
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!K8eg!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Faella.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-1289620307%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titlebpanak on Knowingless
- og:descriptionGood post. You are very good at survey methods and you will get multivariate regression and factor analysis in due time. Really nothing to critique in your essay, here is a man observation: if the critique is so broad and general that “anyone can say the sample is to [large / small / restrictive / biased / … ]” and the critic is not providing details on why the critique is relevant to the specific analysis or interpretation you are working on, then put little weight on that feedback. When the critique is targeted, backed up with citation or thoughts experiment that fits the situation, and paired with recommendations on how to improve your game, weigh that feedback more. Anyone who has taken one course in research methods can come up with 15 different “rival hypothses”, the good critic is one who is discerning and helpful and who critiques the most relevant issue with tact, like a good teacher would.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!K8eg!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Faella.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-1289620307%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data13
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
31- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!rB-2!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffea5e111-ca53-4b78-ae58-92d478ba5901%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!8Jz6!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffea5e111-ca53-4b78-ae58-92d478ba5901%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!eYIA!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffea5e111-ca53-4b78-ae58-92d478ba5901%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!jSU2!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffea5e111-ca53-4b78-ae58-92d478ba5901%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
13- https://aella.substack.com
- https://aella.substack.com/p/you-dont-need-a-perfectly-random/comment/10972327
- https://aella.substack.com/p/you-dont-need-a-perfectly-random/comments#comment-10972327
- https://substack.com
- https://substack.com/@bpanak/note/c-10972327