afeteworsethandeath.substack.com/p/a-brief-addendum/comment/105700186

Preview meta tags from the afeteworsethandeath.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://afeteworsethandeath.substack.com/p/a-brief-addendum/comment/105700186

Al de Baran on a fête worse than death

"My least politically correct opinion is that gatekeepers are a good thing because hierarchies of quality are real." Tangential to the main points here, but if you think that gatekeepers' aims are primarily to preserve a hierarchy of quality, then you are very naive, indeed. Gatekeepers of poetry publications, for instance, are there mainly to ensure that their friends and colleagues fill all the publication spots and win all the prizes, and then to hope for quid pro quo. That scene is corrupt beyond measure (where is Edgar Allan Poe when we need him?). No matter how good your writing, if you are a poet today with no publication history, no MFA, no workshop experience, no academic "residency" affiliation, no prizes to your name, and, most of all, no reciprocal back-scratching friends in editorial positions, then good luck to you. I don't doubt that this applies mutatis mutandis to publication in other fields, as well.



Bing

Al de Baran on a fête worse than death

https://afeteworsethandeath.substack.com/p/a-brief-addendum/comment/105700186

"My least politically correct opinion is that gatekeepers are a good thing because hierarchies of quality are real." Tangential to the main points here, but if you think that gatekeepers' aims are primarily to preserve a hierarchy of quality, then you are very naive, indeed. Gatekeepers of poetry publications, for instance, are there mainly to ensure that their friends and colleagues fill all the publication spots and win all the prizes, and then to hope for quid pro quo. That scene is corrupt beyond measure (where is Edgar Allan Poe when we need him?). No matter how good your writing, if you are a poet today with no publication history, no MFA, no workshop experience, no academic "residency" affiliation, no prizes to your name, and, most of all, no reciprocal back-scratching friends in editorial positions, then good luck to you. I don't doubt that this applies mutatis mutandis to publication in other fields, as well.



DuckDuckGo

https://afeteworsethandeath.substack.com/p/a-brief-addendum/comment/105700186

Al de Baran on a fête worse than death

"My least politically correct opinion is that gatekeepers are a good thing because hierarchies of quality are real." Tangential to the main points here, but if you think that gatekeepers' aims are primarily to preserve a hierarchy of quality, then you are very naive, indeed. Gatekeepers of poetry publications, for instance, are there mainly to ensure that their friends and colleagues fill all the publication spots and win all the prizes, and then to hope for quid pro quo. That scene is corrupt beyond measure (where is Edgar Allan Poe when we need him?). No matter how good your writing, if you are a poet today with no publication history, no MFA, no workshop experience, no academic "residency" affiliation, no prizes to your name, and, most of all, no reciprocal back-scratching friends in editorial positions, then good luck to you. I don't doubt that this applies mutatis mutandis to publication in other fields, as well.

  • General Meta Tags

    15
    • title
      Comments - a brief addendum - by becca rothfeld
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://afeteworsethandeath.substack.com/p/a-brief-addendum/comment/105700186
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!12li!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fafeteworsethandeath.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-1546806375%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Al de Baran on a fête worse than death
    • og:description
      "My least politically correct opinion is that gatekeepers are a good thing because hierarchies of quality are real." Tangential to the main points here, but if you think that gatekeepers' aims are primarily to preserve a hierarchy of quality, then you are very naive, indeed. Gatekeepers of poetry publications, for instance, are there mainly to ensure that their friends and colleagues fill all the publication spots and win all the prizes, and then to hope for quid pro quo. That scene is corrupt beyond measure (where is Edgar Allan Poe when we need him?). No matter how good your writing, if you are a poet today with no publication history, no MFA, no workshop experience, no academic "residency" affiliation, no prizes to your name, and, most of all, no reciprocal back-scratching friends in editorial positions, then good luck to you. I don't doubt that this applies mutatis mutandis to publication in other fields, as well.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!12li!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fafeteworsethandeath.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-1546806375%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    20
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://afeteworsethandeath.substack.com/p/a-brief-addendum/comment/105700186
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • preconnect
      https://substackcdn.com

Links

13