aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294

Preview meta tags from the aseq.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294

Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter

Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.



Bing

Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter

https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294

Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.



DuckDuckGo

https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294

Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter

Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.

  • General Meta Tags

    17
    • title
      Comments - Modeling Sequencing Sensitivity
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!TAJb!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Faseq.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1595519514%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter
    • og:description
      Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!TAJb!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Faseq.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1595519514%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    49
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!mNVz!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!4ZmU!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!vhCZ!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!SSf-!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png

Links

16