aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294
Preview meta tags from the aseq.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter
Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.
Bing
Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter
Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.
DuckDuckGo
Fabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter
Thank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.
General Meta Tags
17- titleComments - Modeling Sequencing Sensitivity
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!TAJb!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Faseq.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1595519514%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleFabio Zanini on ASeq Newsletter
- og:descriptionThank you for the article. Just wanted to comment quickly to help your analysis. If you are on the hunt for sensitivity, you would do ddPCR or smFISH, not qPCR. Both method have single molecule sensitivity given you are able to extract a single molecule of viral nucleic acid from a nasal swab. The efficiency of the extraction itself is highly variable depending on how degraded it is, time since isolation, storage buffer, etc but is independent of the detection method. qPCR is just quick and easy, that's why it's popular. No need to mess with a keyboard. Sensitivity is not really the point there, usually.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!TAJb!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Faseq.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1595519514%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data11
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
49- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!mNVz!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!4ZmU!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!vhCZ!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!SSf-!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
16- https://aseq.substack.com
- https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134294
- https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134859
- https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comments#comment-12134294
- https://substack.com