bradwendel.substack.com/p/ai-wtf/comment/122869781
Preview meta tags from the bradwendel.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
3Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Alex on Legal Ethics Stuff
Thank you for the insightful piece—it really made me reflect. It brought to mind a scenario: Counsel relies on AI to generate case law and submits it as part of testimony. Then, the judge uses the same AI to interpret the results and finds them to be inaccurate. You're absolutely right—AI, at this stage, is still a language model, not true general intelligence. Ultimately, I believe that whatever you submit is your work—accurate or not. I’d be extremely frustrated if my attorney relied on AI-generated content without proper review, only for it to lead to an unfavorable ruling. There’s no question AI has tremendous potential but using it without verifying or understanding the output is a significant risk. I work in business valuation and have to be very cautious myself. I primarily use AI to streamline redundancies, but when it comes to core analysis and conclusions, the responsibility—and liability—remains entirely with me.
Bing
Alex on Legal Ethics Stuff
Thank you for the insightful piece—it really made me reflect. It brought to mind a scenario: Counsel relies on AI to generate case law and submits it as part of testimony. Then, the judge uses the same AI to interpret the results and finds them to be inaccurate. You're absolutely right—AI, at this stage, is still a language model, not true general intelligence. Ultimately, I believe that whatever you submit is your work—accurate or not. I’d be extremely frustrated if my attorney relied on AI-generated content without proper review, only for it to lead to an unfavorable ruling. There’s no question AI has tremendous potential but using it without verifying or understanding the output is a significant risk. I work in business valuation and have to be very cautious myself. I primarily use AI to streamline redundancies, but when it comes to core analysis and conclusions, the responsibility—and liability—remains entirely with me.
DuckDuckGo
Alex on Legal Ethics Stuff
Thank you for the insightful piece—it really made me reflect. It brought to mind a scenario: Counsel relies on AI to generate case law and submits it as part of testimony. Then, the judge uses the same AI to interpret the results and finds them to be inaccurate. You're absolutely right—AI, at this stage, is still a language model, not true general intelligence. Ultimately, I believe that whatever you submit is your work—accurate or not. I’d be extremely frustrated if my attorney relied on AI-generated content without proper review, only for it to lead to an unfavorable ruling. There’s no question AI has tremendous potential but using it without verifying or understanding the output is a significant risk. I work in business valuation and have to be very cautious myself. I primarily use AI to streamline redundancies, but when it comes to core analysis and conclusions, the responsibility—and liability—remains entirely with me.
General Meta Tags
17- titleComments - AI . . . WTF? - by Brad Wendel
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://bradwendel.substack.com/p/ai-wtf/comment/122869781
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!AiLe!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbradwendel.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1154026622%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleAlex on Legal Ethics Stuff
- og:descriptionThank you for the insightful piece—it really made me reflect. It brought to mind a scenario: Counsel relies on AI to generate case law and submits it as part of testimony. Then, the judge uses the same AI to interpret the results and finds them to be inaccurate. You're absolutely right—AI, at this stage, is still a language model, not true general intelligence. Ultimately, I believe that whatever you submit is your work—accurate or not. I’d be extremely frustrated if my attorney relied on AI-generated content without proper review, only for it to lead to an unfavorable ruling. There’s no question AI has tremendous potential but using it without verifying or understanding the output is a significant risk. I work in business valuation and have to be very cautious myself. I primarily use AI to streamline redundancies, but when it comes to core analysis and conclusions, the responsibility—and liability—remains entirely with me.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!AiLe!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbradwendel.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1154026622%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data11
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
31- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!h0jr!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fde16fa09-a234-484c-8edc-c5041d12ee76%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!q-z3!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fde16fa09-a234-484c-8edc-c5041d12ee76%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!CAD0!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fde16fa09-a234-484c-8edc-c5041d12ee76%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!G6Qq!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fde16fa09-a234-484c-8edc-c5041d12ee76%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
20- https://bradwendel.substack.com
- https://bradwendel.substack.com/p/ai-wtf/comment/122869781
- https://bradwendel.substack.com/p/ai-wtf/comment/122924106
- https://bradwendel.substack.com/p/ai-wtf/comment/123107817
- https://bradwendel.substack.com/p/ai-wtf/comments#comment-122869781