Tim Groves on The Truth Barrier

So, you are satisfied that there was a corpse, and that a bonafide autopsy was conducted, but that the body was not that of Jeffrey Epstein? Were the people conducting the autopsy aware that the corpse was not Epstein or did the body switch fool them too? Wouldn't they have ways of confirming the identity of the corpse? Surely they would look for identifying marks, consult photographs, dental records, other medical records, fingerprints (if these things were available)? If the corpse wasn't —and I'm only saying "if"— then NY's Chief Medical Officer Barbara Sampson, who conducted the autopsy, would have had to be in on it. And if she was in on that, she could have equally well have been in on a pretend autopsy. I repeat, why murder a person merely in order to fake another person's suicide, when it is possible to fake that person's suicide without going to the bother of murdering anyone? I'm only hypothesizing, and not making any claims, but I'm wondering how much of the evidence the public has been exposed can be shown to be legitimate, so that we can set a boundary on the possible in this case. For instance, I suppose it is safe to say that Epstein wasn't whisked away by extraterrestrials. Last year I was listening to an entertaining interview with Eric Weinstein, and he was explaining that Jeffrey Epstein may not have been a real individual in the first place, but could instead have been a character played by an actor on occasions when a public appearance was needed. That hypothesis appealed to me, although I admit it is probably wrong an possibly misdirection.