
cground.substack.com/p/albertans-perception-problem-how/comment/89061224
Preview meta tags from the cground.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
3Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Your Name on Common Ground: Connecting Communities & Politics
How did something like supervised consumption sites become labelled “progressive” in the first place, and opposition to these sites in favour of other models become “conservative”? If I think supervised consumption sites are riddled with problems, based on the evidence, am I suddenly a “conservative”? This shouldn’t be political. Let science and evidence lead the way.
Bing
Your Name on Common Ground: Connecting Communities & Politics
How did something like supervised consumption sites become labelled “progressive” in the first place, and opposition to these sites in favour of other models become “conservative”? If I think supervised consumption sites are riddled with problems, based on the evidence, am I suddenly a “conservative”? This shouldn’t be political. Let science and evidence lead the way.
DuckDuckGo

Your Name on Common Ground: Connecting Communities & Politics
How did something like supervised consumption sites become labelled “progressive” in the first place, and opposition to these sites in favour of other models become “conservative”? If I think supervised consumption sites are riddled with problems, based on the evidence, am I suddenly a “conservative”? This shouldn’t be political. Let science and evidence lead the way.
General Meta Tags
15- titleComments - Albertans’ Perception Problem: How Misjudging Public Opinion Shapes Our Politics
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://cground.substack.com/p/albertans-perception-problem-how/comment/89061224
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!WuMN!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fcground.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-188959425%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleYour Name on Common Ground: Connecting Communities & Politics
- og:descriptionHow did something like supervised consumption sites become labelled “progressive” in the first place, and opposition to these sites in favour of other models become “conservative”? If I think supervised consumption sites are riddled with problems, based on the evidence, am I suddenly a “conservative”? This shouldn’t be political. Let science and evidence lead the way.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!WuMN!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fcground.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-188959425%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data11
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
19- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
- canonicalhttps://cground.substack.com/p/albertans-perception-problem-how/comment/89061224
- iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
- preconnecthttps://substackcdn.com
Links
17- https://cground.substack.com
- https://cground.substack.com/p/albertans-perception-problem-how/comment/89061224
- https://cground.substack.com/p/albertans-perception-problem-how/comment/92222800
- https://cground.substack.com/p/albertans-perception-problem-how/comments#comment-89061224
- https://substack.com