ericnormand.substack.com/p/ai-lisp-and-programming/comment/129015543

Preview meta tags from the ericnormand.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://ericnormand.substack.com/p/ai-lisp-and-programming/comment/129015543

Eric Normand on Eric Normand's Newsletter

Hey Christian, You're right that FORTRAN does predate LISP. I should have been more clear. Here's what I meant: 1. The FORTRAN compiler effort was considered to be "automatic programming", meaning doing the work of humans. Though it wasn't done by the same people as the mainline AI and LISP tradition, I consider it to be adjacent. 2. Lexers and parsers, as we know them today, where you present a grammar notation, did come from the AI tradition. Once again, sorry I wasn't clear. Rock on! Eric



Bing

Eric Normand on Eric Normand's Newsletter

https://ericnormand.substack.com/p/ai-lisp-and-programming/comment/129015543

Hey Christian, You're right that FORTRAN does predate LISP. I should have been more clear. Here's what I meant: 1. The FORTRAN compiler effort was considered to be "automatic programming", meaning doing the work of humans. Though it wasn't done by the same people as the mainline AI and LISP tradition, I consider it to be adjacent. 2. Lexers and parsers, as we know them today, where you present a grammar notation, did come from the AI tradition. Once again, sorry I wasn't clear. Rock on! Eric



DuckDuckGo

https://ericnormand.substack.com/p/ai-lisp-and-programming/comment/129015543

Eric Normand on Eric Normand's Newsletter

Hey Christian, You're right that FORTRAN does predate LISP. I should have been more clear. Here's what I meant: 1. The FORTRAN compiler effort was considered to be "automatic programming", meaning doing the work of humans. Though it wasn't done by the same people as the mainline AI and LISP tradition, I consider it to be adjacent. 2. Lexers and parsers, as we know them today, where you present a grammar notation, did come from the AI tradition. Once again, sorry I wasn't clear. Rock on! Eric

  • General Meta Tags

    16
    • title
      Comments - AI, Lisp, and Programming
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://ericnormand.substack.com/p/ai-lisp-and-programming/comment/129015543
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!cRBN!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fericnormand.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1729122991%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Eric Normand on Eric Normand's Newsletter
    • og:description
      Hey Christian, You're right that FORTRAN does predate LISP. I should have been more clear. Here's what I meant: 1. The FORTRAN compiler effort was considered to be "automatic programming", meaning doing the work of humans. Though it wasn't done by the same people as the mainline AI and LISP tradition, I consider it to be adjacent. 2. Lexers and parsers, as we know them today, where you present a grammar notation, did come from the AI tradition. Once again, sorry I wasn't clear. Rock on! Eric

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!cRBN!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fericnormand.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D1729122991%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies

  • Link Tags

    19
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://ericnormand.substack.com/p/ai-lisp-and-programming/comment/129015543
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • preconnect
      https://substackcdn.com

Links

13