SomeDude on Jack’s Substack - One Man's Opinion

it seems our disagreement revolves around how much to remove. if you consider how many government subdivisions have been added over the centuries, there's a huge amount of the Juggernaut which doesn't fall under "constitutionally enumerated" but was instead formed by either legislation, or comparatively rarely until the last couple decades, by some sort of executive order or other executive overreach. I get the impression you argue that the parts of that which serve any beneficial function for the citizenry shouldn't be dismantled before fixing them. I figure the broken system parts which are supposed to be beneficial have too much accumulated bureaucracy and too many problem employees/appointees to actually clean them up without complete deletion and rebuilding from the ground up. I will freely admit that a better method would be to identify everything in the federal bureaucracy by the top level tentacles whose existence facilitate all the subdepartments, on down to the tips of the branching tentacles, which aren't constitutionally enumerated federal powers or agencies. then figure out which wriggling bits of the mass have mission statements justifying their salvage for rebuild, and build the new system taking over functions as the failed agencies are shut down. the main thing that made me think of that was the globalist functional failure with the shift to alternate energy sources involving shutdown and demolition of existing, working, power infrastructure... before building anything close to adequate in the way of alternative sources first. no point emulating the globalists intentionally (ugh) so I'll propose this unfleshed out skeletal alternative framework as an option.