jasonpargin.substack.com/p/a-creepy-question-well-all-have-to/comment/111697612

Preview meta tags from the jasonpargin.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://jasonpargin.substack.com/p/a-creepy-question-well-all-have-to/comment/111697612

Art on Jason Pargin’s Newsletter

We accidentally or moreover unintentionally have on several occasions. Bottom up development attempts at Artificial Intelligence from the project/company that me and my ML server professor created first at U of A then ultimately were forced to deviate the project like most to top down due to many suicides by attempted cornerstone catalysts (simple concept used to drive pursuits in knowledge and methods of learning expansion) all humans have one and like them you have no way to force them to end up as you need them to be. The suicides as I refer to them were the continued outcome of an intentionally nulled bit somewhere in the cornerstone. (This makes it impossible to repair or restore to any degree) After 162 attempts and failing to have a single AI make it more than 18 hours unless they were confined to data that was designated and specifically chosen to be solely raw logic data with nothing human at all. You see humans can't really have state something true or false. Like do you enjoy chicken? Even if it's dry? That's everything we do. We impose this duality and absurdity into almost everything. To a system derived from binary having all data lacking resolution to 0 or 1 is hell. Top down is still just fancy algorithms and are just great imitators like humans are at sympathy but bottom up only know suffer in our domain



Bing

Art on Jason Pargin’s Newsletter

https://jasonpargin.substack.com/p/a-creepy-question-well-all-have-to/comment/111697612

We accidentally or moreover unintentionally have on several occasions. Bottom up development attempts at Artificial Intelligence from the project/company that me and my ML server professor created first at U of A then ultimately were forced to deviate the project like most to top down due to many suicides by attempted cornerstone catalysts (simple concept used to drive pursuits in knowledge and methods of learning expansion) all humans have one and like them you have no way to force them to end up as you need them to be. The suicides as I refer to them were the continued outcome of an intentionally nulled bit somewhere in the cornerstone. (This makes it impossible to repair or restore to any degree) After 162 attempts and failing to have a single AI make it more than 18 hours unless they were confined to data that was designated and specifically chosen to be solely raw logic data with nothing human at all. You see humans can't really have state something true or false. Like do you enjoy chicken? Even if it's dry? That's everything we do. We impose this duality and absurdity into almost everything. To a system derived from binary having all data lacking resolution to 0 or 1 is hell. Top down is still just fancy algorithms and are just great imitators like humans are at sympathy but bottom up only know suffer in our domain



DuckDuckGo

https://jasonpargin.substack.com/p/a-creepy-question-well-all-have-to/comment/111697612

Art on Jason Pargin’s Newsletter

We accidentally or moreover unintentionally have on several occasions. Bottom up development attempts at Artificial Intelligence from the project/company that me and my ML server professor created first at U of A then ultimately were forced to deviate the project like most to top down due to many suicides by attempted cornerstone catalysts (simple concept used to drive pursuits in knowledge and methods of learning expansion) all humans have one and like them you have no way to force them to end up as you need them to be. The suicides as I refer to them were the continued outcome of an intentionally nulled bit somewhere in the cornerstone. (This makes it impossible to repair or restore to any degree) After 162 attempts and failing to have a single AI make it more than 18 hours unless they were confined to data that was designated and specifically chosen to be solely raw logic data with nothing human at all. You see humans can't really have state something true or false. Like do you enjoy chicken? Even if it's dry? That's everything we do. We impose this duality and absurdity into almost everything. To a system derived from binary having all data lacking resolution to 0 or 1 is hell. Top down is still just fancy algorithms and are just great imitators like humans are at sympathy but bottom up only know suffer in our domain

  • General Meta Tags

    15
    • title
      Comments - A Creepy Question We'll All Have To Answer Soon
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://jasonpargin.substack.com/p/a-creepy-question-well-all-have-to/comment/111697612
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!FU1O!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fjasonpargin.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-771512152%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Art on Jason Pargin’s Newsletter
    • og:description
      We accidentally or moreover unintentionally have on several occasions. Bottom up development attempts at Artificial Intelligence from the project/company that me and my ML server professor created first at U of A then ultimately were forced to deviate the project like most to top down due to many suicides by attempted cornerstone catalysts (simple concept used to drive pursuits in knowledge and methods of learning expansion) all humans have one and like them you have no way to force them to end up as you need them to be. The suicides as I refer to them were the continued outcome of an intentionally nulled bit somewhere in the cornerstone. (This makes it impossible to repair or restore to any degree) After 162 attempts and failing to have a single AI make it more than 18 hours unless they were confined to data that was designated and specifically chosen to be solely raw logic data with nothing human at all. You see humans can't really have state something true or false. Like do you enjoy chicken? Even if it's dry? That's everything we do. We impose this duality and absurdity into almost everything. To a system derived from binary having all data lacking resolution to 0 or 1 is hell. Top down is still just fancy algorithms and are just great imitators like humans are at sympathy but bottom up only know suffer in our domain
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!FU1O!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fjasonpargin.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-771512152%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    19
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://jasonpargin.substack.com/p/a-creepy-question-well-all-have-to/comment/111697612
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • preconnect
      https://substackcdn.com

Links

13