
kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/a-conversation-with-simon-laird/comment/131884212
Preview meta tags from the kittenbeloved.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Ven on Kitten
Well, to me, the issue is that the statement was simply wrong. I also don’t think there’s anything like a reason worthy of going all Straussian on it. The truth is that we don’t have that many police in cities relative to the amount of crime and basically no prosecutors relative to it. It’s not surprising that we decline to do something about bike thieves and shoplifters when the raw manpower necessary doesn’t exist. And, like, you should have been more pointed on SL (I forget what that stands for) whining about Gladwell. Broken windows theory is wrong because it’s not the evidence of crime which makes people do more crime, it’s that there’s no evidence of getting caught. The big problem isn’t that some punk kid broke out the window of an abandoned factory, it’s that there weren’t any consequences *at all*. Not just that once, but literally every time. People see that and either indulge their worse angels or they subtly shift their views on morality.
Bing
Ven on Kitten
Well, to me, the issue is that the statement was simply wrong. I also don’t think there’s anything like a reason worthy of going all Straussian on it. The truth is that we don’t have that many police in cities relative to the amount of crime and basically no prosecutors relative to it. It’s not surprising that we decline to do something about bike thieves and shoplifters when the raw manpower necessary doesn’t exist. And, like, you should have been more pointed on SL (I forget what that stands for) whining about Gladwell. Broken windows theory is wrong because it’s not the evidence of crime which makes people do more crime, it’s that there’s no evidence of getting caught. The big problem isn’t that some punk kid broke out the window of an abandoned factory, it’s that there weren’t any consequences *at all*. Not just that once, but literally every time. People see that and either indulge their worse angels or they subtly shift their views on morality.
DuckDuckGo

Ven on Kitten
Well, to me, the issue is that the statement was simply wrong. I also don’t think there’s anything like a reason worthy of going all Straussian on it. The truth is that we don’t have that many police in cities relative to the amount of crime and basically no prosecutors relative to it. It’s not surprising that we decline to do something about bike thieves and shoplifters when the raw manpower necessary doesn’t exist. And, like, you should have been more pointed on SL (I forget what that stands for) whining about Gladwell. Broken windows theory is wrong because it’s not the evidence of crime which makes people do more crime, it’s that there’s no evidence of getting caught. The big problem isn’t that some punk kid broke out the window of an abandoned factory, it’s that there weren’t any consequences *at all*. Not just that once, but literally every time. People see that and either indulge their worse angels or they subtly shift their views on morality.
General Meta Tags
18- titleComments - A conversation with Simon Laird - Kitten
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/a-conversation-with-simon-laird/comment/131884212
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_w0W!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fkittenbeloved.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-1871376647%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleVen on Kitten
- og:descriptionWell, to me, the issue is that the statement was simply wrong. I also don’t think there’s anything like a reason worthy of going all Straussian on it. The truth is that we don’t have that many police in cities relative to the amount of crime and basically no prosecutors relative to it. It’s not surprising that we decline to do something about bike thieves and shoplifters when the raw manpower necessary doesn’t exist. And, like, you should have been more pointed on SL (I forget what that stands for) whining about Gladwell. Broken windows theory is wrong because it’s not the evidence of crime which makes people do more crime, it’s that there’s no evidence of getting caught. The big problem isn’t that some punk kid broke out the window of an abandoned factory, it’s that there weren’t any consequences *at all*. Not just that once, but literally every time. People see that and either indulge their worse angels or they subtly shift their views on morality.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_w0W!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fkittenbeloved.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-1871376647%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data12
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
19- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
- canonicalhttps://kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/a-conversation-with-simon-laird/comment/131884212
- iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
- preconnecthttps://substackcdn.com
Links
16- https://kittenbeloved.substack.com
- https://kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/a-conversation-with-simon-laird/comment/131884212
- https://kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/a-conversation-with-simon-laird/comment/131902547
- https://kittenbeloved.substack.com/p/a-conversation-with-simon-laird/comments#comment-131884212
- https://substack.com