math.answers.com/geometry/Convert_counts_per_second_to_bq_per_square_cm

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/geometry/Convert_counts_per_second_to_bq_per_square_cm

Convert counts per second to bq per square cm? - Answers

(CpSx(100/swab efficiency)x(100/counter efficiency))/area sampled=Bq/cm2 I don't convert CPS to Bq/squaer meter; because it compares apples to Oranges in a bogus empty way. Bequerels are a measured count of the fragments coming from a number of atoms disintegrating in three dimensions in 1 second. Fine, but if you count only those going "UP" to get your two dimensional meters per second number ,you ignore those going "DOWN" and thus cut your total atomic disintegration (your radioactivity) rate in half. It also ignores the space above the two dimensional plane which may (and likely is) filled with flying frying fragments in that three dimensional volume of "sizzle space". A more honest measure is per cubic meter, or per gram dirt, or per cm x square meter plus the space above it. People inhabit a three dimensional "sizzle space" and if they get hit by an atomic "flying fragment "(externally or internally) they "sizzle, depending on the amount of fragments (including Gamma photons as "fragments for now) the type of flying fragment( alpha,beta,gamma,neutron etc),the energy of the fragment,where it hit,and what they had for lunch. So data only on Bq per square meter is deceptively incomplete.



Bing

Convert counts per second to bq per square cm? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/geometry/Convert_counts_per_second_to_bq_per_square_cm

(CpSx(100/swab efficiency)x(100/counter efficiency))/area sampled=Bq/cm2 I don't convert CPS to Bq/squaer meter; because it compares apples to Oranges in a bogus empty way. Bequerels are a measured count of the fragments coming from a number of atoms disintegrating in three dimensions in 1 second. Fine, but if you count only those going "UP" to get your two dimensional meters per second number ,you ignore those going "DOWN" and thus cut your total atomic disintegration (your radioactivity) rate in half. It also ignores the space above the two dimensional plane which may (and likely is) filled with flying frying fragments in that three dimensional volume of "sizzle space". A more honest measure is per cubic meter, or per gram dirt, or per cm x square meter plus the space above it. People inhabit a three dimensional "sizzle space" and if they get hit by an atomic "flying fragment "(externally or internally) they "sizzle, depending on the amount of fragments (including Gamma photons as "fragments for now) the type of flying fragment( alpha,beta,gamma,neutron etc),the energy of the fragment,where it hit,and what they had for lunch. So data only on Bq per square meter is deceptively incomplete.



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/geometry/Convert_counts_per_second_to_bq_per_square_cm

Convert counts per second to bq per square cm? - Answers

(CpSx(100/swab efficiency)x(100/counter efficiency))/area sampled=Bq/cm2 I don't convert CPS to Bq/squaer meter; because it compares apples to Oranges in a bogus empty way. Bequerels are a measured count of the fragments coming from a number of atoms disintegrating in three dimensions in 1 second. Fine, but if you count only those going "UP" to get your two dimensional meters per second number ,you ignore those going "DOWN" and thus cut your total atomic disintegration (your radioactivity) rate in half. It also ignores the space above the two dimensional plane which may (and likely is) filled with flying frying fragments in that three dimensional volume of "sizzle space". A more honest measure is per cubic meter, or per gram dirt, or per cm x square meter plus the space above it. People inhabit a three dimensional "sizzle space" and if they get hit by an atomic "flying fragment "(externally or internally) they "sizzle, depending on the amount of fragments (including Gamma photons as "fragments for now) the type of flying fragment( alpha,beta,gamma,neutron etc),the energy of the fragment,where it hit,and what they had for lunch. So data only on Bq per square meter is deceptively incomplete.

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      Convert counts per second to bq per square cm? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      (CpSx(100/swab efficiency)x(100/counter efficiency))/area sampled=Bq/cm2 I don't convert CPS to Bq/squaer meter; because it compares apples to Oranges in a bogus empty way. Bequerels are a measured count of the fragments coming from a number of atoms disintegrating in three dimensions in 1 second. Fine, but if you count only those going "UP" to get your two dimensional meters per second number ,you ignore those going "DOWN" and thus cut your total atomic disintegration (your radioactivity) rate in half. It also ignores the space above the two dimensional plane which may (and likely is) filled with flying frying fragments in that three dimensional volume of "sizzle space". A more honest measure is per cubic meter, or per gram dirt, or per cm x square meter plus the space above it. People inhabit a three dimensional "sizzle space" and if they get hit by an atomic "flying fragment "(externally or internally) they "sizzle, depending on the amount of fragments (including Gamma photons as "fragments for now) the type of flying fragment( alpha,beta,gamma,neutron etc),the energy of the fragment,where it hit,and what they had for lunch. So data only on Bq per square meter is deceptively incomplete.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/geometry/Convert_counts_per_second_to_bq_per_square_cm
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

59