math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_16_30_34_pythagorean_triples

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_16_30_34_pythagorean_triples

Are 16 30 34 pythagorean triples? - Answers

No, the numbers 16, 30, and 34 do not form a Pythagorean triple. For a set of three numbers to be a Pythagorean triple, the sum of the squares of the two smaller numbers must equal the square of the largest number. In this case, (16^2 + 30^2 = 256 + 900 = 1156), while (34^2 = 1156), which satisfies the condition, but it should be noted that for Pythagorean triples, the numbers are typically expressed in the form (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) with (c) being the largest. Hence, 16, 30, and 34 can be considered a Pythagorean triple.



Bing

Are 16 30 34 pythagorean triples? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_16_30_34_pythagorean_triples

No, the numbers 16, 30, and 34 do not form a Pythagorean triple. For a set of three numbers to be a Pythagorean triple, the sum of the squares of the two smaller numbers must equal the square of the largest number. In this case, (16^2 + 30^2 = 256 + 900 = 1156), while (34^2 = 1156), which satisfies the condition, but it should be noted that for Pythagorean triples, the numbers are typically expressed in the form (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) with (c) being the largest. Hence, 16, 30, and 34 can be considered a Pythagorean triple.



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_16_30_34_pythagorean_triples

Are 16 30 34 pythagorean triples? - Answers

No, the numbers 16, 30, and 34 do not form a Pythagorean triple. For a set of three numbers to be a Pythagorean triple, the sum of the squares of the two smaller numbers must equal the square of the largest number. In this case, (16^2 + 30^2 = 256 + 900 = 1156), while (34^2 = 1156), which satisfies the condition, but it should be noted that for Pythagorean triples, the numbers are typically expressed in the form (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) with (c) being the largest. Hence, 16, 30, and 34 can be considered a Pythagorean triple.

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      Are 16 30 34 pythagorean triples? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      No, the numbers 16, 30, and 34 do not form a Pythagorean triple. For a set of three numbers to be a Pythagorean triple, the sum of the squares of the two smaller numbers must equal the square of the largest number. In this case, (16^2 + 30^2 = 256 + 900 = 1156), while (34^2 = 1156), which satisfies the condition, but it should be noted that for Pythagorean triples, the numbers are typically expressed in the form (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) with (c) being the largest. Hence, 16, 30, and 34 can be considered a Pythagorean triple.

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image

  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_16_30_34_pythagorean_triples
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

58