math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_there_other_no_like_1729

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_there_other_no_like_1729

Are there other no like 1729? - Answers

Yes. But depending on the characteristic of 1729 that is chosen, there are different answers: 1729, the Ramanujan-Hardy number is the smallest sum of two different pairs of positive cubes. Being the smallest such number, there cannot be another LIKE it because the other won't be the smallest. Also, if negative numbers are allowed, there is a much smaller solution: 63 + (-5)3 = 216 - 125 = 91 and 43 + 33 = 64 + 27 = 91 This can also be presented as four consecutive integers, the sum of the smaller two cubed being the same as the difference of the larger two cubed. The 1729th decimal place is the beginning of the first occurrence of all ten digits consecutively in the decimal representation of e, the base of natural logariths. This is not unique because it would apply to e+0.5 or e plus any decimal that terminates before 1729 places, it is unique in the sense that few mathematicians will come across memorable transcendental numbers other than e and pi. 1729 is one of only 4 positive integers such that the sum of its digits multiplied by the reversal of the answer gives the original number. This 1+7+2+9 = 19 and 19*91 = 1729. In this case, then, there are three other numbers, although one of them is trivial: it is 1.



Bing

Are there other no like 1729? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_there_other_no_like_1729

Yes. But depending on the characteristic of 1729 that is chosen, there are different answers: 1729, the Ramanujan-Hardy number is the smallest sum of two different pairs of positive cubes. Being the smallest such number, there cannot be another LIKE it because the other won't be the smallest. Also, if negative numbers are allowed, there is a much smaller solution: 63 + (-5)3 = 216 - 125 = 91 and 43 + 33 = 64 + 27 = 91 This can also be presented as four consecutive integers, the sum of the smaller two cubed being the same as the difference of the larger two cubed. The 1729th decimal place is the beginning of the first occurrence of all ten digits consecutively in the decimal representation of e, the base of natural logariths. This is not unique because it would apply to e+0.5 or e plus any decimal that terminates before 1729 places, it is unique in the sense that few mathematicians will come across memorable transcendental numbers other than e and pi. 1729 is one of only 4 positive integers such that the sum of its digits multiplied by the reversal of the answer gives the original number. This 1+7+2+9 = 19 and 19*91 = 1729. In this case, then, there are three other numbers, although one of them is trivial: it is 1.



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_there_other_no_like_1729

Are there other no like 1729? - Answers

Yes. But depending on the characteristic of 1729 that is chosen, there are different answers: 1729, the Ramanujan-Hardy number is the smallest sum of two different pairs of positive cubes. Being the smallest such number, there cannot be another LIKE it because the other won't be the smallest. Also, if negative numbers are allowed, there is a much smaller solution: 63 + (-5)3 = 216 - 125 = 91 and 43 + 33 = 64 + 27 = 91 This can also be presented as four consecutive integers, the sum of the smaller two cubed being the same as the difference of the larger two cubed. The 1729th decimal place is the beginning of the first occurrence of all ten digits consecutively in the decimal representation of e, the base of natural logariths. This is not unique because it would apply to e+0.5 or e plus any decimal that terminates before 1729 places, it is unique in the sense that few mathematicians will come across memorable transcendental numbers other than e and pi. 1729 is one of only 4 positive integers such that the sum of its digits multiplied by the reversal of the answer gives the original number. This 1+7+2+9 = 19 and 19*91 = 1729. In this case, then, there are three other numbers, although one of them is trivial: it is 1.

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      Are there other no like 1729? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      Yes. But depending on the characteristic of 1729 that is chosen, there are different answers: 1729, the Ramanujan-Hardy number is the smallest sum of two different pairs of positive cubes. Being the smallest such number, there cannot be another LIKE it because the other won't be the smallest. Also, if negative numbers are allowed, there is a much smaller solution: 63 + (-5)3 = 216 - 125 = 91 and 43 + 33 = 64 + 27 = 91 This can also be presented as four consecutive integers, the sum of the smaller two cubed being the same as the difference of the larger two cubed. The 1729th decimal place is the beginning of the first occurrence of all ten digits consecutively in the decimal representation of e, the base of natural logariths. This is not unique because it would apply to e+0.5 or e plus any decimal that terminates before 1729 places, it is unique in the sense that few mathematicians will come across memorable transcendental numbers other than e and pi. 1729 is one of only 4 positive integers such that the sum of its digits multiplied by the reversal of the answer gives the original number. This 1+7+2+9 = 19 and 19*91 = 1729. In this case, then, there are three other numbers, although one of them is trivial: it is 1.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Are_there_other_no_like_1729
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

58