math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Fixed_point_iteration_methods_plus_algorithm

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Fixed_point_iteration_methods_plus_algorithm

Fixed point iteration methods plus algorithm? - Answers

There are 2 main methods for fixed point iteration, the Newton-Raphson method, and the Secant method.This method uses the formula, xn+1 = xn - f(xn) / f'(xn),where xn is the initial point, f(xn) is the value of the function at that point, and f'(xn) is the value of the differentiated function at that point. Plug all these values into the above equation to get xn+1, which then becomes the next initial point. Repeat until you get a point within an acceptable degree of error.the formula for this method is, xn+1= xn - (f(xn)(xn - xn-1)) / (f(xn) - f(xn-1)).With this formula you do not need the differentiated form of the function, making this a better method than the N-R for functions difficult to differentiate. However you do need two initial points for this method to work (xn and xn-1). Again just plug the appropriate values into the formula to generate the next point approximation.NB: with both of these methods be careful which initial point you choose, especially with the N-R method, as depending on the function the approximation iterations can go out of control and zoom away from the point you're trying to find.Also, a note on errors, you can sometimes get a better approximation by fiddling with your function a bit and reducing the amount of calculations needed. For example if you have two equivalent functions, but one takes 3 calculations to get a value and the other takes 6, the latter takes more work and will generally give a bigger error than the previous. Usually this error increase is only marginal, but depending on the function and the values used, the potential error can be huge. This only needs to be taken into account though if you want extremely accurate results. (Things to look out for if trying to reduce error: subtracting near equal numbers, dividing by a small number or multiplying by a large number, cancellation of significant figures)



Bing

Fixed point iteration methods plus algorithm? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Fixed_point_iteration_methods_plus_algorithm

There are 2 main methods for fixed point iteration, the Newton-Raphson method, and the Secant method.This method uses the formula, xn+1 = xn - f(xn) / f'(xn),where xn is the initial point, f(xn) is the value of the function at that point, and f'(xn) is the value of the differentiated function at that point. Plug all these values into the above equation to get xn+1, which then becomes the next initial point. Repeat until you get a point within an acceptable degree of error.the formula for this method is, xn+1= xn - (f(xn)(xn - xn-1)) / (f(xn) - f(xn-1)).With this formula you do not need the differentiated form of the function, making this a better method than the N-R for functions difficult to differentiate. However you do need two initial points for this method to work (xn and xn-1). Again just plug the appropriate values into the formula to generate the next point approximation.NB: with both of these methods be careful which initial point you choose, especially with the N-R method, as depending on the function the approximation iterations can go out of control and zoom away from the point you're trying to find.Also, a note on errors, you can sometimes get a better approximation by fiddling with your function a bit and reducing the amount of calculations needed. For example if you have two equivalent functions, but one takes 3 calculations to get a value and the other takes 6, the latter takes more work and will generally give a bigger error than the previous. Usually this error increase is only marginal, but depending on the function and the values used, the potential error can be huge. This only needs to be taken into account though if you want extremely accurate results. (Things to look out for if trying to reduce error: subtracting near equal numbers, dividing by a small number or multiplying by a large number, cancellation of significant figures)



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Fixed_point_iteration_methods_plus_algorithm

Fixed point iteration methods plus algorithm? - Answers

There are 2 main methods for fixed point iteration, the Newton-Raphson method, and the Secant method.This method uses the formula, xn+1 = xn - f(xn) / f'(xn),where xn is the initial point, f(xn) is the value of the function at that point, and f'(xn) is the value of the differentiated function at that point. Plug all these values into the above equation to get xn+1, which then becomes the next initial point. Repeat until you get a point within an acceptable degree of error.the formula for this method is, xn+1= xn - (f(xn)(xn - xn-1)) / (f(xn) - f(xn-1)).With this formula you do not need the differentiated form of the function, making this a better method than the N-R for functions difficult to differentiate. However you do need two initial points for this method to work (xn and xn-1). Again just plug the appropriate values into the formula to generate the next point approximation.NB: with both of these methods be careful which initial point you choose, especially with the N-R method, as depending on the function the approximation iterations can go out of control and zoom away from the point you're trying to find.Also, a note on errors, you can sometimes get a better approximation by fiddling with your function a bit and reducing the amount of calculations needed. For example if you have two equivalent functions, but one takes 3 calculations to get a value and the other takes 6, the latter takes more work and will generally give a bigger error than the previous. Usually this error increase is only marginal, but depending on the function and the values used, the potential error can be huge. This only needs to be taken into account though if you want extremely accurate results. (Things to look out for if trying to reduce error: subtracting near equal numbers, dividing by a small number or multiplying by a large number, cancellation of significant figures)

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      Fixed point iteration methods plus algorithm? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      There are 2 main methods for fixed point iteration, the Newton-Raphson method, and the Secant method.This method uses the formula, xn+1 = xn - f(xn) / f'(xn),where xn is the initial point, f(xn) is the value of the function at that point, and f'(xn) is the value of the differentiated function at that point. Plug all these values into the above equation to get xn+1, which then becomes the next initial point. Repeat until you get a point within an acceptable degree of error.the formula for this method is, xn+1= xn - (f(xn)(xn - xn-1)) / (f(xn) - f(xn-1)).With this formula you do not need the differentiated form of the function, making this a better method than the N-R for functions difficult to differentiate. However you do need two initial points for this method to work (xn and xn-1). Again just plug the appropriate values into the formula to generate the next point approximation.NB: with both of these methods be careful which initial point you choose, especially with the N-R method, as depending on the function the approximation iterations can go out of control and zoom away from the point you're trying to find.Also, a note on errors, you can sometimes get a better approximation by fiddling with your function a bit and reducing the amount of calculations needed. For example if you have two equivalent functions, but one takes 3 calculations to get a value and the other takes 6, the latter takes more work and will generally give a bigger error than the previous. Usually this error increase is only marginal, but depending on the function and the values used, the potential error can be huge. This only needs to be taken into account though if you want extremely accurate results. (Things to look out for if trying to reduce error: subtracting near equal numbers, dividing by a small number or multiplying by a large number, cancellation of significant figures)
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/Fixed_point_iteration_methods_plus_algorithm
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

58