math.answers.com/other-math/How_could_you_estimate_the_square_root_of_130

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_could_you_estimate_the_square_root_of_130

How could you estimate the square root of 130? - Answers

There are several methods that are based on trial-and-improvement or iteration and a relatively efficient example of this is the Newton-Raphson method. Define the function f(x) = x2 - 130. Your question can then be re-written as finding the solution to f(x) = 0. Let f'(x) = 2x. [This is the derivative of f(x) but you don't need to know or understand that.] Make an initial guess at the solution to f(x) = 0 and call it x0. Then let xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... . Thus, each estimate can be used to make the next (better) estimate. This sequence will soon reach a sufficiently accurate estimate. For example, if you start with x0 = 8 which is a pretty poor estimate since 82 = 64 is less than half of 130, x2 is less than 0.2% away from the true answer. Finally remember that there are two square roots: a positive, as well as a negative one. There is another method that resembles long division except that the divisor is augmented at each step but explaining it using this browser is too difficult for me.



Bing

How could you estimate the square root of 130? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_could_you_estimate_the_square_root_of_130

There are several methods that are based on trial-and-improvement or iteration and a relatively efficient example of this is the Newton-Raphson method. Define the function f(x) = x2 - 130. Your question can then be re-written as finding the solution to f(x) = 0. Let f'(x) = 2x. [This is the derivative of f(x) but you don't need to know or understand that.] Make an initial guess at the solution to f(x) = 0 and call it x0. Then let xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... . Thus, each estimate can be used to make the next (better) estimate. This sequence will soon reach a sufficiently accurate estimate. For example, if you start with x0 = 8 which is a pretty poor estimate since 82 = 64 is less than half of 130, x2 is less than 0.2% away from the true answer. Finally remember that there are two square roots: a positive, as well as a negative one. There is another method that resembles long division except that the divisor is augmented at each step but explaining it using this browser is too difficult for me.



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_could_you_estimate_the_square_root_of_130

How could you estimate the square root of 130? - Answers

There are several methods that are based on trial-and-improvement or iteration and a relatively efficient example of this is the Newton-Raphson method. Define the function f(x) = x2 - 130. Your question can then be re-written as finding the solution to f(x) = 0. Let f'(x) = 2x. [This is the derivative of f(x) but you don't need to know or understand that.] Make an initial guess at the solution to f(x) = 0 and call it x0. Then let xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... . Thus, each estimate can be used to make the next (better) estimate. This sequence will soon reach a sufficiently accurate estimate. For example, if you start with x0 = 8 which is a pretty poor estimate since 82 = 64 is less than half of 130, x2 is less than 0.2% away from the true answer. Finally remember that there are two square roots: a positive, as well as a negative one. There is another method that resembles long division except that the divisor is augmented at each step but explaining it using this browser is too difficult for me.

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      How could you estimate the square root of 130? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      There are several methods that are based on trial-and-improvement or iteration and a relatively efficient example of this is the Newton-Raphson method. Define the function f(x) = x2 - 130. Your question can then be re-written as finding the solution to f(x) = 0. Let f'(x) = 2x. [This is the derivative of f(x) but you don't need to know or understand that.] Make an initial guess at the solution to f(x) = 0 and call it x0. Then let xn+1 = xn - f(xn)/f'(xn) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... . Thus, each estimate can be used to make the next (better) estimate. This sequence will soon reach a sufficiently accurate estimate. For example, if you start with x0 = 8 which is a pretty poor estimate since 82 = 64 is less than half of 130, x2 is less than 0.2% away from the true answer. Finally remember that there are two square roots: a positive, as well as a negative one. There is another method that resembles long division except that the divisor is augmented at each step but explaining it using this browser is too difficult for me.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_could_you_estimate_the_square_root_of_130
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

58