math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_round_961.625_to_two_decimal_places
Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.
Linked Hostnames
8- 32 links tomath.answers.com
- 20 links towww.answers.com
- 1 link totwitter.com
- 1 link towww.facebook.com
- 1 link towww.instagram.com
- 1 link towww.pinterest.com
- 1 link towww.tiktok.com
- 1 link towww.youtube.com
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
How do you round 961.625 to two decimal places? - Answers
961.62Some people advise you to round up 0.5. Others say round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:In the first caseIf the number is 0.0 you don't need to roundIf the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round downIf the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round upSo 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.Possible solution:Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
Bing
How do you round 961.625 to two decimal places? - Answers
961.62Some people advise you to round up 0.5. Others say round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:In the first caseIf the number is 0.0 you don't need to roundIf the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round downIf the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round upSo 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.Possible solution:Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
DuckDuckGo
How do you round 961.625 to two decimal places? - Answers
961.62Some people advise you to round up 0.5. Others say round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:In the first caseIf the number is 0.0 you don't need to roundIf the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round downIf the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round upSo 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.Possible solution:Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
General Meta Tags
22- titleHow do you round 961.625 to two decimal places? - Answers
- charsetutf-8
- Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
- viewportminimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge,chrome=1
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:imagehttps://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
- og:image:width900
- og:image:height900
- og:site_nameAnswers
- og:description961.62Some people advise you to round up 0.5. Others say round down. The problem with either approach is as follows:In the first caseIf the number is 0.0 you don't need to roundIf the number is 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 you round downIf the number is 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 you round upSo 4 downs and 5 ups (and one no change).Net Result: you introduce an upward bias.In the second scenario, you introduce a downward bias through rounding.Possible solution:Round up from 0.5 half the time, round down the other half. That satisfies the bias problem but introduces another - that of reproducibility. If someone else were to look at your data would they round up/down the same way you did? Unlikely. You need a system which will round 0.5 up half the time and down half the time but where the decision is made for you.Hence the best solution is the answer given above: Round up or down so that the new last digit is even.
Twitter Meta Tags
1- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
Link Tags
16- alternatehttps://www.answers.com/feed.rss
- apple-touch-icon/icons/180x180.png
- canonicalhttps://math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_round_961.625_to_two_decimal_places
- icon/favicon.svg
- icon/icons/16x16.png
Links
58- https://math.answers.com
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_round_961.625_to_two_decimal_places
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_many_eighths_in_2_and_3_quarters
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_many_hours_is_in_11.7_miles
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_many_sides_does_the_semicircle_have