math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_solve_an_inequality_with_a_negative_coefficient
Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.
Linked Hostnames
8- 35 links tomath.answers.com
- 17 links towww.answers.com
- 1 link totwitter.com
- 1 link towww.facebook.com
- 1 link towww.instagram.com
- 1 link towww.pinterest.com
- 1 link towww.tiktok.com
- 1 link towww.youtube.com
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
How do you solve an inequality with a negative coefficient? - Answers
The easiest way is to "flip" the inequality symbol end divide by the negative number:Example:6 < 3 - 3s6 - 3 < 3 - 3s -33 < -3s Method a) Divide by negative coefficient and flip the inequality symbol3/-3 > -3s/-3-1 > s or s< -13 < -3s Method b) Full algorithm, eliminate -3s by adding 3s on both sides3 +3s < -3s + 3s3 + 3s < 03 - 3 + 3s < 0 -33s < -33s/3 < -3/3s < -1 Looks familiar? So basically if you perform the full algorithm (method b) you can understand why we flip the inequality symbol when we have to eliminate a negative coefficient but it is faster just to flip the symbol (method a)
Bing
How do you solve an inequality with a negative coefficient? - Answers
The easiest way is to "flip" the inequality symbol end divide by the negative number:Example:6 < 3 - 3s6 - 3 < 3 - 3s -33 < -3s Method a) Divide by negative coefficient and flip the inequality symbol3/-3 > -3s/-3-1 > s or s< -13 < -3s Method b) Full algorithm, eliminate -3s by adding 3s on both sides3 +3s < -3s + 3s3 + 3s < 03 - 3 + 3s < 0 -33s < -33s/3 < -3/3s < -1 Looks familiar? So basically if you perform the full algorithm (method b) you can understand why we flip the inequality symbol when we have to eliminate a negative coefficient but it is faster just to flip the symbol (method a)
DuckDuckGo
How do you solve an inequality with a negative coefficient? - Answers
The easiest way is to "flip" the inequality symbol end divide by the negative number:Example:6 < 3 - 3s6 - 3 < 3 - 3s -33 < -3s Method a) Divide by negative coefficient and flip the inequality symbol3/-3 > -3s/-3-1 > s or s< -13 < -3s Method b) Full algorithm, eliminate -3s by adding 3s on both sides3 +3s < -3s + 3s3 + 3s < 03 - 3 + 3s < 0 -33s < -33s/3 < -3/3s < -1 Looks familiar? So basically if you perform the full algorithm (method b) you can understand why we flip the inequality symbol when we have to eliminate a negative coefficient but it is faster just to flip the symbol (method a)
General Meta Tags
22- titleHow do you solve an inequality with a negative coefficient? - Answers
- charsetutf-8
- Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
- viewportminimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge,chrome=1
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:imagehttps://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
- og:image:width900
- og:image:height900
- og:site_nameAnswers
- og:descriptionThe easiest way is to "flip" the inequality symbol end divide by the negative number:Example:6 < 3 - 3s6 - 3 < 3 - 3s -33 < -3s Method a) Divide by negative coefficient and flip the inequality symbol3/-3 > -3s/-3-1 > s or s< -13 < -3s Method b) Full algorithm, eliminate -3s by adding 3s on both sides3 +3s < -3s + 3s3 + 3s < 03 - 3 + 3s < 0 -33s < -33s/3 < -3/3s < -1 Looks familiar? So basically if you perform the full algorithm (method b) you can understand why we flip the inequality symbol when we have to eliminate a negative coefficient but it is faster just to flip the symbol (method a)
Twitter Meta Tags
1- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
Link Tags
16- alternatehttps://www.answers.com/feed.rss
- apple-touch-icon/icons/180x180.png
- canonicalhttps://math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_solve_an_inequality_with_a_negative_coefficient
- icon/favicon.svg
- icon/icons/16x16.png
Links
58- https://math.answers.com
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_solve_an_inequality_with_a_negative_coefficient
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/How_do_you_write_0.51_as_a_fraction_in_simplest_form
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/If_a_diameter_is_60mm_what_is_the_circumference
- https://math.answers.com/other-math/Is_0.04_closer_to_0.3_or_0.051