maxgladstone.substack.com/p/censor-y-deprivation/comment/123826970

Preview meta tags from the maxgladstone.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://maxgladstone.substack.com/p/censor-y-deprivation/comment/123826970

Vlad on The Third Place

Yes, LLMs can and likely will / do contribute to censorship :/ The only silver lining is that people will figure out ways around them. One of the nice things about our human language is, as Godel put it, it can't be both complete and consistent! So no matter how fancy an LLM is, it can't catch every possible way of expressing a particular concept. The tougher thing is LLMs making rich "paper" trails -- like info ops that come with pre-built websites, fake articles, even faked footage of something happening. This is already a problem, and will only become more of a problem with time... right now my gut feeling is that people will just get a lot more skeptical about anything they see online, and/or spend a lot more time in walled garden type spaces like Discord. I've recently started talking about LLMs as a tool, and that feels about right for me. A tool can be handy, can be useful... can be dangerous and socially disruptive. But perhaps treating it as a tool can make it feel a bit more manageable.



Bing

Vlad on The Third Place

https://maxgladstone.substack.com/p/censor-y-deprivation/comment/123826970

Yes, LLMs can and likely will / do contribute to censorship :/ The only silver lining is that people will figure out ways around them. One of the nice things about our human language is, as Godel put it, it can't be both complete and consistent! So no matter how fancy an LLM is, it can't catch every possible way of expressing a particular concept. The tougher thing is LLMs making rich "paper" trails -- like info ops that come with pre-built websites, fake articles, even faked footage of something happening. This is already a problem, and will only become more of a problem with time... right now my gut feeling is that people will just get a lot more skeptical about anything they see online, and/or spend a lot more time in walled garden type spaces like Discord. I've recently started talking about LLMs as a tool, and that feels about right for me. A tool can be handy, can be useful... can be dangerous and socially disruptive. But perhaps treating it as a tool can make it feel a bit more manageable.



DuckDuckGo

https://maxgladstone.substack.com/p/censor-y-deprivation/comment/123826970

Vlad on The Third Place

Yes, LLMs can and likely will / do contribute to censorship :/ The only silver lining is that people will figure out ways around them. One of the nice things about our human language is, as Godel put it, it can't be both complete and consistent! So no matter how fancy an LLM is, it can't catch every possible way of expressing a particular concept. The tougher thing is LLMs making rich "paper" trails -- like info ops that come with pre-built websites, fake articles, even faked footage of something happening. This is already a problem, and will only become more of a problem with time... right now my gut feeling is that people will just get a lot more skeptical about anything they see online, and/or spend a lot more time in walled garden type spaces like Discord. I've recently started talking about LLMs as a tool, and that feels about right for me. A tool can be handy, can be useful... can be dangerous and socially disruptive. But perhaps treating it as a tool can make it feel a bit more manageable.

  • General Meta Tags

    17
    • title
      Comments - Censor-y Deprivation - by Max Gladstone
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://maxgladstone.substack.com/p/censor-y-deprivation/comment/123826970
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!5XNF!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fmaxgladstone.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-506687553%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Vlad on The Third Place
    • og:description
      Yes, LLMs can and likely will / do contribute to censorship :/ The only silver lining is that people will figure out ways around them. One of the nice things about our human language is, as Godel put it, it can't be both complete and consistent! So no matter how fancy an LLM is, it can't catch every possible way of expressing a particular concept. The tougher thing is LLMs making rich "paper" trails -- like info ops that come with pre-built websites, fake articles, even faked footage of something happening. This is already a problem, and will only become more of a problem with time... right now my gut feeling is that people will just get a lot more skeptical about anything they see online, and/or spend a lot more time in walled garden type spaces like Discord. I've recently started talking about LLMs as a tool, and that feels about right for me. A tool can be handy, can be useful... can be dangerous and socially disruptive. But perhaps treating it as a tool can make it feel a bit more manageable.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!5XNF!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fmaxgladstone.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-506687553%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    20
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://maxgladstone.substack.com/p/censor-y-deprivation/comment/123826970
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • preconnect
      https://substackcdn.com

Links

16