model-thinking.com/p/assessing-altruism/comment/41687579

Preview meta tags from the model-thinking.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://model-thinking.com/p/assessing-altruism/comment/41687579

Duncan McClements on Model Thinking

Thanks for the reflections - I think they should be able to explain the results! Schwarze and Wilkelmann's paper tracks generational transfers after individuals have left their parents' homes: our confusion referred more to the surprisingly high level of consumption of children while they are much younger. If parental altruism fell with children's age then this would offer a way to reconcile the estimates as well: parents choose their number of children based on future utility, but choose consumption of themselves and their children in each year based on utility maximisation in that year. This hypothesis seems plausible as the Barro-Becker parameter you estimate once discounting is included is 0.15, compared to the about 0.085 (averaged over men and women) in their regression with full controls instruments etc: so assuming constant child consumption over their lifetime, 2% discount, 80 years of lifetime of which 20 are childhood this gives a coefficient of 0.25, which once some other effects are accounted for (greater concavity than log, scale economies in households, etc) should give an estimate for the current consumption of children as a fraction of their parents that is not too implausible.



Bing

Duncan McClements on Model Thinking

https://model-thinking.com/p/assessing-altruism/comment/41687579

Thanks for the reflections - I think they should be able to explain the results! Schwarze and Wilkelmann's paper tracks generational transfers after individuals have left their parents' homes: our confusion referred more to the surprisingly high level of consumption of children while they are much younger. If parental altruism fell with children's age then this would offer a way to reconcile the estimates as well: parents choose their number of children based on future utility, but choose consumption of themselves and their children in each year based on utility maximisation in that year. This hypothesis seems plausible as the Barro-Becker parameter you estimate once discounting is included is 0.15, compared to the about 0.085 (averaged over men and women) in their regression with full controls instruments etc: so assuming constant child consumption over their lifetime, 2% discount, 80 years of lifetime of which 20 are childhood this gives a coefficient of 0.25, which once some other effects are accounted for (greater concavity than log, scale economies in households, etc) should give an estimate for the current consumption of children as a fraction of their parents that is not too implausible.



DuckDuckGo

https://model-thinking.com/p/assessing-altruism/comment/41687579

Duncan McClements on Model Thinking

Thanks for the reflections - I think they should be able to explain the results! Schwarze and Wilkelmann's paper tracks generational transfers after individuals have left their parents' homes: our confusion referred more to the surprisingly high level of consumption of children while they are much younger. If parental altruism fell with children's age then this would offer a way to reconcile the estimates as well: parents choose their number of children based on future utility, but choose consumption of themselves and their children in each year based on utility maximisation in that year. This hypothesis seems plausible as the Barro-Becker parameter you estimate once discounting is included is 0.15, compared to the about 0.085 (averaged over men and women) in their regression with full controls instruments etc: so assuming constant child consumption over their lifetime, 2% discount, 80 years of lifetime of which 20 are childhood this gives a coefficient of 0.25, which once some other effects are accounted for (greater concavity than log, scale economies in households, etc) should give an estimate for the current consumption of children as a fraction of their parents that is not too implausible.

  • General Meta Tags

    16
    • title
      Comments - Assessing altruism
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://model-thinking.com/p/assessing-altruism/comment/41687579
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!e4kc!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fmodelthinking.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D859992266%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Duncan McClements on Model Thinking
    • og:description
      Thanks for the reflections - I think they should be able to explain the results! Schwarze and Wilkelmann's paper tracks generational transfers after individuals have left their parents' homes: our confusion referred more to the surprisingly high level of consumption of children while they are much younger. If parental altruism fell with children's age then this would offer a way to reconcile the estimates as well: parents choose their number of children based on future utility, but choose consumption of themselves and their children in each year based on utility maximisation in that year. This hypothesis seems plausible as the Barro-Becker parameter you estimate once discounting is included is 0.15, compared to the about 0.085 (averaged over men and women) in their regression with full controls instruments etc: so assuming constant child consumption over their lifetime, 2% discount, 80 years of lifetime of which 20 are childhood this gives a coefficient of 0.25, which once some other effects are accounted for (greater concavity than log, scale economies in households, etc) should give an estimate for the current consumption of children as a fraction of their parents that is not too implausible.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!e4kc!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fmodelthinking.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D859992266%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      2
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    32
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!FzKF!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F258cd2d2-6385-42a6-a9c1-5b52051c7d5c%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!QpfY!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F258cd2d2-6385-42a6-a9c1-5b52051c7d5c%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!2pyT!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F258cd2d2-6385-42a6-a9c1-5b52051c7d5c%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!pxjU!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F258cd2d2-6385-42a6-a9c1-5b52051c7d5c%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png

Links

13