statsepi.substack.com/p/a-conversation-on-treatment-effects/comment/71269892
Preview meta tags from the statsepi.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
MarkS on Life is pain, especially your data
Angel #1: Wait, you're telling me that almost 300 years after Laplace and Bayes explained how to do statistical inference correctly, the primitives are still using frequentist methodology? A methodology that is fundamentally incapable of telling them what they actually want to know, which is how likely it is that the effect is real? Angel #2: Yes. Angel #1: (weeps softly)
Bing
MarkS on Life is pain, especially your data
Angel #1: Wait, you're telling me that almost 300 years after Laplace and Bayes explained how to do statistical inference correctly, the primitives are still using frequentist methodology? A methodology that is fundamentally incapable of telling them what they actually want to know, which is how likely it is that the effect is real? Angel #2: Yes. Angel #1: (weeps softly)
DuckDuckGo
MarkS on Life is pain, especially your data
Angel #1: Wait, you're telling me that almost 300 years after Laplace and Bayes explained how to do statistical inference correctly, the primitives are still using frequentist methodology? A methodology that is fundamentally incapable of telling them what they actually want to know, which is how likely it is that the effect is real? Angel #2: Yes. Angel #1: (weeps softly)
General Meta Tags
16- titleComments - A conversation on treatment effects
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://statsepi.substack.com/p/a-conversation-on-treatment-effects/comment/71269892
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!R8s7!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fstatsepi.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D299788298%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleMarkS on Life is pain, especially your data
- og:descriptionAngel #1: Wait, you're telling me that almost 300 years after Laplace and Bayes explained how to do statistical inference correctly, the primitives are still using frequentist methodology? A methodology that is fundamentally incapable of telling them what they actually want to know, which is how likely it is that the effect is real? Angel #2: Yes. Angel #1: (weeps softly)
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!R8s7!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fstatsepi.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D299788298%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data12
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
31- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Nhrs!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F20c0f00b-4041-42a8-b904-45e63469fa73%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!VSYl!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F20c0f00b-4041-42a8-b904-45e63469fa73%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!YRCL!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F20c0f00b-4041-42a8-b904-45e63469fa73%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Rt-I!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F20c0f00b-4041-42a8-b904-45e63469fa73%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
13- https://statsepi.substack.com
- https://statsepi.substack.com/p/a-conversation-on-treatment-effects/comment/71269892
- https://statsepi.substack.com/p/a-conversation-on-treatment-effects/comments#comment-71269892
- https://substack.com
- https://substack.com/@marksmusings/note/c-71269892