substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485

Preview meta tags from the substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485

Gray (@graybroderick)

I wrote something in the same vein for my email earlier. Mistaking exposure and sharing for intimacy; "connections" with relationships, the world feels intimacy-less right now, lacking space for vulnerability. The immediacy and ease of access to information raises our demand to Veruca Salt "I want it now" level: we expect access, we expect details without working, putting effort in, for it. And we also display ourselves without boundaries, too: to constantly share our lives is the norm. But that leads to a hyper-awareness of how one's constantly read and, because the internet is the most empathetic space, causes self-censorship via self-commodification, crafting a perfectly curated/branded self as armor against avoid negative exposure. It shuts people down from being vulnerable and letting their guards down, thereby blocking any chance of finding intimate connection, from deeper relationships that result in things like "biodiverse" subcultures. Gate keeping can be an effort to salvage these sorts of relationships. "The Other Side of Gate-Keeping Viewed one-dimensionally, the other concept that requires clarification is gate-keeping. Only seen to be a fence, its hinge is forgotten. A gate is the passage between interior and exterior, from one space to another, private to public, mine to another's. It is both about keeping out and allowing in. The current conception of “gate-keeping” is exclusionary, cast aside its ability of letting people in. It is just as much about blocking someone’s presence as cautiously permitting entry. Whereas a fence is defensive, a gate is where defensiveness can fall — where trust is tested. Gate-keeping is yes about exclusion — you can’t sit with us — but also the process of self-protection, of deciding who enters your “home,” where you let your guard down. Selective in either instance, one establishing a hierarchy and the other an intimate gesture — exposing one’s vulnerabilities and potential weaknesses. A gate is an architectural reminder that you’re entering private grounds, sacred space. In an era where we constantly share our lives, gatekeeping can facilitate calm and intimacy, where one can make mistakes and embody eccentricities without worrying about others’ eager eyes, their judgements. Stepping through the threshold via a gate is a reminder that someone else’s world is precious, not to be publicized on your terms — you’re in their home. This second dimension, the empathetic cousin of privacy, deserves recognition, as well."



Bing

Gray (@graybroderick)

https://substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485

I wrote something in the same vein for my email earlier. Mistaking exposure and sharing for intimacy; "connections" with relationships, the world feels intimacy-less right now, lacking space for vulnerability. The immediacy and ease of access to information raises our demand to Veruca Salt "I want it now" level: we expect access, we expect details without working, putting effort in, for it. And we also display ourselves without boundaries, too: to constantly share our lives is the norm. But that leads to a hyper-awareness of how one's constantly read and, because the internet is the most empathetic space, causes self-censorship via self-commodification, crafting a perfectly curated/branded self as armor against avoid negative exposure. It shuts people down from being vulnerable and letting their guards down, thereby blocking any chance of finding intimate connection, from deeper relationships that result in things like "biodiverse" subcultures. Gate keeping can be an effort to salvage these sorts of relationships. "The Other Side of Gate-Keeping Viewed one-dimensionally, the other concept that requires clarification is gate-keeping. Only seen to be a fence, its hinge is forgotten. A gate is the passage between interior and exterior, from one space to another, private to public, mine to another's. It is both about keeping out and allowing in. The current conception of “gate-keeping” is exclusionary, cast aside its ability of letting people in. It is just as much about blocking someone’s presence as cautiously permitting entry. Whereas a fence is defensive, a gate is where defensiveness can fall — where trust is tested. Gate-keeping is yes about exclusion — you can’t sit with us — but also the process of self-protection, of deciding who enters your “home,” where you let your guard down. Selective in either instance, one establishing a hierarchy and the other an intimate gesture — exposing one’s vulnerabilities and potential weaknesses. A gate is an architectural reminder that you’re entering private grounds, sacred space. In an era where we constantly share our lives, gatekeeping can facilitate calm and intimacy, where one can make mistakes and embody eccentricities without worrying about others’ eager eyes, their judgements. Stepping through the threshold via a gate is a reminder that someone else’s world is precious, not to be publicized on your terms — you’re in their home. This second dimension, the empathetic cousin of privacy, deserves recognition, as well."



DuckDuckGo

https://substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485

Gray (@graybroderick)

I wrote something in the same vein for my email earlier. Mistaking exposure and sharing for intimacy; "connections" with relationships, the world feels intimacy-less right now, lacking space for vulnerability. The immediacy and ease of access to information raises our demand to Veruca Salt "I want it now" level: we expect access, we expect details without working, putting effort in, for it. And we also display ourselves without boundaries, too: to constantly share our lives is the norm. But that leads to a hyper-awareness of how one's constantly read and, because the internet is the most empathetic space, causes self-censorship via self-commodification, crafting a perfectly curated/branded self as armor against avoid negative exposure. It shuts people down from being vulnerable and letting their guards down, thereby blocking any chance of finding intimate connection, from deeper relationships that result in things like "biodiverse" subcultures. Gate keeping can be an effort to salvage these sorts of relationships. "The Other Side of Gate-Keeping Viewed one-dimensionally, the other concept that requires clarification is gate-keeping. Only seen to be a fence, its hinge is forgotten. A gate is the passage between interior and exterior, from one space to another, private to public, mine to another's. It is both about keeping out and allowing in. The current conception of “gate-keeping” is exclusionary, cast aside its ability of letting people in. It is just as much about blocking someone’s presence as cautiously permitting entry. Whereas a fence is defensive, a gate is where defensiveness can fall — where trust is tested. Gate-keeping is yes about exclusion — you can’t sit with us — but also the process of self-protection, of deciding who enters your “home,” where you let your guard down. Selective in either instance, one establishing a hierarchy and the other an intimate gesture — exposing one’s vulnerabilities and potential weaknesses. A gate is an architectural reminder that you’re entering private grounds, sacred space. In an era where we constantly share our lives, gatekeeping can facilitate calm and intimacy, where one can make mistakes and embody eccentricities without worrying about others’ eager eyes, their judgements. Stepping through the threshold via a gate is a reminder that someone else’s world is precious, not to be publicized on your terms — you’re in their home. This second dimension, the empathetic cousin of privacy, deserves recognition, as well."

  • General Meta Tags

    14
    • title
      Gray (@graybroderick): "I wrote something in the same vein for my email earlier. Mistaking exposure and sharing for intimacy; "connections" with relationships, the world feels intimacy-less right now, lacking space for vulnerability. The immediacy and ease of access to information raises our demand to …"
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • og:image:width
      400
    • og:image:height
      400
    • og:type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    18
    • alternate
      https://substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://substack.com/@graybroderick/note/c-54876485
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • manifest
      /manifest.json

Links

5