substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394

Preview meta tags from the substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394

Rudolf Laine (@lrudl)

Re video models: the standard against which they’re very good is humans not distinguishing them from videos of the world, which is quite different from simulating the world. Also note we know from physics that the fundamental laws seem simple. But we don’t do video models by simulating physics. Inference is clearly not cheap re the world. Rather, it seems there is so much detail in the world that a data heavy heuristic capturing approach beats actually dealing with the object level detail. Re a few terabytes: that’s a lot! Genomes are tiny compared to that - O(1GB), and most of that irrelevant to the actual body - and our bodies or those of many other animals sure are very complex.



Bing

Rudolf Laine (@lrudl)

https://substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394

Re video models: the standard against which they’re very good is humans not distinguishing them from videos of the world, which is quite different from simulating the world. Also note we know from physics that the fundamental laws seem simple. But we don’t do video models by simulating physics. Inference is clearly not cheap re the world. Rather, it seems there is so much detail in the world that a data heavy heuristic capturing approach beats actually dealing with the object level detail. Re a few terabytes: that’s a lot! Genomes are tiny compared to that - O(1GB), and most of that irrelevant to the actual body - and our bodies or those of many other animals sure are very complex.



DuckDuckGo

https://substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394

Rudolf Laine (@lrudl)

Re video models: the standard against which they’re very good is humans not distinguishing them from videos of the world, which is quite different from simulating the world. Also note we know from physics that the fundamental laws seem simple. But we don’t do video models by simulating physics. Inference is clearly not cheap re the world. Rather, it seems there is so much detail in the world that a data heavy heuristic capturing approach beats actually dealing with the object level detail. Re a few terabytes: that’s a lot! Genomes are tiny compared to that - O(1GB), and most of that irrelevant to the actual body - and our bodies or those of many other animals sure are very complex.

  • General Meta Tags

    14
    • title
      Rudolf Laine (@lrudl): "Re video models: the standard against which they’re very good is humans not distinguishing them from videos of the world, which is quite different from simulating the world. Also note we know from physics that the fundamental laws seem simple. But we don’t do video models by si…"
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • og:image:width
      400
    • og:image:height
      400
    • og:type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    17
    • alternate
      https://substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://substack.com/@lrudl/note/c-124429394
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • manifest
      /manifest.json

Links

5